Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24942228›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2016

Approach toward an efficient inoculum preparation stage for suspension BHK-21 cell culture.

Eutimio Gustavo Fernández Núñez, Jaci Leme, Letícia de Almeida Parizotto, Alexandre Gonçalves de Rezende, Bruno Labate Vale da Costa, Vera Lucia Lopes Boldorini, Soraia Attie Calil Jorge, Renato Mancini Astray, Carlos Augusto Pereira, Celso Pereira Caricati and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eutimio Gustavo Fernández NúñezLaboratório de Células Animais, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav. 3, 380, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil. eutimiocu@yahoo.com.
Jaci LemeLaboratório Especial de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Imunológicos Veterinários, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Letícia de Almeida ParizottoLaboratório de Células Animais, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav. 3, 380, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil.
Alexandre Gonçalves de RezendeLaboratório de Imunologia Viral, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05503-900, Brazil.
Bruno Labate Vale da CostaLaboratório de Biotecnologia Industrial, Núcleo de Bionanomanufatura, Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas do Estado de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Almeida Prado 532 Cid. Universitária - Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05508-901, Brazil.
Vera Lucia Lopes BoldoriniLaboratório de Imunologia Viral, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05503-900, Brazil.
Soraia Attie Calil JorgeLaboratório de Imunologia Viral, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05503-900, Brazil.
Renato Mancini AstrayLaboratório de Imunologia Viral, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05503-900, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto PereiraLaboratório de Células Animais, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav. 3, 380, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil.
Celso Pereira CaricatiLaboratório Especial de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Imunológicos Veterinários, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aldo TonsoLaboratório de Células Animais, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav. 3, 380, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian cells are the most frequently used hosts for biopharmaceutical proteins manufacturing. Inoculum quality is a key element for establishing an efficient bioconversion process. The main objective in inoculation expansion process is to generate large volume of viable cells in the shortest time. The aim of this paper was to optimize the inoculum preparation stage of baby hamster kidney (BHK)-21 cells for suspension cultures in benchtop bioreactors, by means of a combination of static and agitated culture systems. Critical parameters for static (liquid column height: 5, 10, 15 mm) and agitated (working volume: 35, 50, 65 mL, inoculum volume percentage: 10, 30 % and agitation speed: 25, 60 rpm) cultures were study in T-flask and spinner flask, respectively. The optimal liquid column height was 5 mm for static culture. The maximum viable cell concentration in spinner flask cultures was reached with 50 mL working volume and the inoculum volume percentage was not significant in the range under study (10-30 %) at 25 rpm agitation. Agitation speed at 60 rpm did not change the main kinetic parameters with respect to those observed for 25 rpm. These results allowed for a schedule to produce more than 4 × 10(9) BHK-21 cells from 4 × 10(6) cells in 13 day with 1,051 mL culture medium.

Indexed as

BHK-21BioreactorInoculum preparationMammalian cellsSpinner flaskStatic cell cultureSuspension cell culture

Identifiers

PMID24942228
PMCPMC4698255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.