ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2014
Burkitt's lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis--two case reports and review of the literature.
Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double-Expressor Appendiceal Burkitt's Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in hematology · 2022Article
- Burkitt Leukemia Presenting as Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2020Review
- Burkitt's lymphoma presenting as acute appendicitis: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2018Article
- Gastrointestinal surgery and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2015Review
- Surgery for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.Oncology reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two cases of Burkitt's lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis are reported herein. The diagnoses were made post-operatively from the appendix specimen in one case and from an ileocecal resection specimen for cecal fistula complicating an appendicectomy in the second case. These cases highlight the importance of routine histological examination of appendicectomy specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.