Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24940997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Effects of cationic antimicrobial peptides on liquid-preserved boar spermatozoa.

Martin Schulze, Christof Junkes, Peter Mueller, Stephanie Speck, Karin Ruediger, Margitta Dathe, Karin Mueller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perspectives in porcine semen conservation (liquid and frozen).The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bacteria and Boar Semen Storage: Progress and Challenges.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equine Reproduction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preliminary Assessment of the Mucosal Toxicity of Tea Tree (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Alternatives to antibiotics in semen extenders: a review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin SchulzeInstitute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow Inc., Bernau, Brandenburg, Germany.
Christof JunkesLeibniz Institute for Molecular Pharmacology, Berlin, Germany.
Peter MuellerDepartment of Biology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephanie SpeckInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany.
Karin RuedigerInstitute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow Inc., Bernau, Brandenburg, Germany.
Margitta DatheLeibniz Institute for Molecular Pharmacology, Berlin, Germany.
Karin MuellerLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz Association · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are mandatory additives in semen extenders to control bacterial contamination. The worldwide increase in resistance to conventional antibiotics requires the search for alternatives not only for animal artificial insemination industries, but also for veterinary and human medicine. Cationic antimicrobial peptides are of interest as a novel class of antimicrobial additives for boar semen preservation. The present study investigated effects of two synthetic cyclic hexapeptides (c-WFW, c-WWW) and a synthetic helical magainin II amide derivative (MK5E) on boar sperm during semen storage at 16 °C for 4 days. The standard extender, Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS) containing 250 µg/mL gentamicin (standard), was compared to combinations of BTS with each of the peptides in a split-sample procedure. Examination revealed peptide- and concentration-dependent effects on sperm integrity and motility. Negative effects were more pronounced for MK5E than in hexapeptide-supplemented samples. The cyclic hexapeptides were partly able to stimulate a linear progressive sperm movement. When using low concentrations of cyclic hexapeptides (4 µM c-WFW, 2 µM c-WWW) sperm quality was comparable to the standard extender over the course of preservation. C-WFW-supplemented boar semen resulted in normal fertility rates after AI. In order to investigate the interaction of peptides with the membrane, electron spin resonance spectroscopic measurements were performed using spin-labeled lipids. C-WWW and c-WFW reversibly immobilized an analog of phosphatidylcholine (PC), whereas MK5E caused an irreversible increase of PC mobility. These results suggest testing the antimicrobial efficiency of non-toxic concentrations of selected cyclic hexapeptides as potential candidates to supplement/replace common antibiotics in semen preservation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCold TemperatureElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyExcipientsFemaleInsemination, ArtificialMagaininsMalePeptides, CyclicSemen PreservationSpermatozoaSperm MotilitySwineXenopus ProteinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesExcipientsmagainin 2 peptide, XenopusMagaininsPeptides, CyclicXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24940997
PMCPMC4062521
OpenAlexW2036854265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.