Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24940782›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations provide insight into substrate recognition by small heat shock proteins.

Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling, Florence Tama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (April-May-June, 2014).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sunita PatelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Elizabeth VierlingDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Florence TamaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; RIKEN, Advanced Institute for Computational Sciences, 7-1-26, Minatojima-minami-machi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan. Electronic address: florence.tama@gmail.com.

Funding

Structure/Function of Small Heat Shock ProteinsR01GM042762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI VIERLING, ELIZABETH · 1989 to 2014
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042762NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM42762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) are a virtually ubiquitous and diverse group of molecular chaperones that can bind and protect unfolding proteins from irreversible aggregation. It has been suggested that intrinsic disorder of the N-terminal arm (NTA) of sHSPs is important for substrate recognition. To investigate conformations of the NTA that could recognize substrates we performed replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. Behavior at normal and stress temperatures of the dimeric building blocks of dodecameric HSPs from wheat (Ta16.9) and pea (Ps18.1) were compared because they display high sequence similarity, but Ps18.1 is more efficient in binding specific substrates. In our simulations, the NTAs of the dimer are flexible and dynamic; however, rather than exhibiting highly extended conformations they retain considerable α-helical character and contacts with the conserved α-crystallin domain (ACD). Network analysis and clustering methods reveal that there are two major conformational forms designated either "open" or "closed" based on the relative position of the two NTAs and their hydrophobic solvent accessible surface area. The equilibrium constant for the closed to open transition is significantly different for Ta16.9 and Ps18.1, with the latter showing more open conformations at elevated temperature correlated with its more effective chaperone activity. In addition, the Ps18.1 NTAs have more hydrophobic solvent accessible surface than those of Ta16.9. NTA hydrophobic patches are comparable in size to the area buried in many protein-protein interactions, which would enable sHSPs to bind early unfolding intermediates. Reduced interactions of the Ps18.1 NTAs with each other and with the ACD contribute to the differences in dynamics and hydrophobic surface area of the two sHSPs. These data support a major role for the conformational equilibrium of the NTA in substrate binding and indicate features of the NTA that contribute to sHSP chaperone efficiency.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceHeat-Shock Proteins, SmallHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPisum sativumPlant ProteinsProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiarySolventsSubstrate SpecificityTemperatureAmino AcidsHeat-Shock Proteins, SmallPlant ProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID24940782
PMCPMC4070073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.