Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24940618›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2014

Local signaling from a retinal prosthetic in a rodent retinitis pigmentosa model in vivo.

James W Fransen, Gobinda Pangeni, Machelle T Pardue, Maureen A McCall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integration of Perforated Subretinal Prostheses With Retinal Tissue.Translational vision science & technology · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James W FransenDepartment of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Gobinda Pangeni
Machelle T Pardue
Maureen A McCall
University of Louisville · USAtlanta VA Medical Center · US

Funding

High Resolution Photovoltaic Retinal ProsthesisR01EY018608 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2009 to 2016
$9.2M
Ganglion Cell Function in Retinal DiseaseR01EY014701 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MCCALL, MAUREEN A · 2004 to 2014
$3.5M
Training Program in TransplantationT32HL076138 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ILDSTAD, SUZANNE T, SHIRWAN, HAVAL · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY018608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014701NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018608NHLBI NIH HHS 5 T32 HL 76138-09NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn clinical trials, retinitis pigmentosa patients implanted with a retinal prosthetic device show enhanced spatial vision, including the ability to read large text and navigate. New prosthetics aim to increase spatial resolution by decreasing pixel/electrode size and limiting current spread. To examine spatial resolution of a new prosthetic design, we characterized and compared two photovoltaic array (PVA) designs and their interaction with the retina after subretinal implantation in transgenic S334ter line 3 rats (Tg S334ter-3). APPROACH: PVAs were implanted subretinally at two stages of degeneration and assessed in vivo using extracellular recordings in the superior colliculus (SC). Several aspects of this interaction were evaluated by varying duration, irradiance and position of a near infrared laser focused on the PVA. These characteristics included: activation threshold, response linearity, SC signal topography and spatial localization. The major design difference between the two PVA designs is the inclusion of local current returns in the newer design. MAIN

resultsWhen tested in vivo, PVA-evoked response thresholds were independent of pixel/electrode size, but differ between the new and old PVA designs. Response thresholds were independent of implantation age and duration (⩽7.5 months). For both prosthesis designs, threshold intensities were within established safety limits. PVA-evoked responses require inner retina synaptic transmission and do not directly activate retinal ganglion cells. The new PVA design evokes local retinal activation, which is not found with the older PVA design that lacks local current returns. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides in vivo evidence that prosthetics make functional contacts with the inner nuclear layer at several stages of degeneration. The new PVA design enhances local activation within the retina and SC. Together these results predict that the new design can potentially harness the inherent processing within the retina and is likely to produce higher spatial resolution in patients.

Indexed as

Superior ColliculiVisual ProsthesisAnimalsEvoked Potentials, VisualLasersPhotic StimulationProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationRatsRats, Long-EvansRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID24940618
PMCPMC4128185
OpenAlexW2045538015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.