Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24940309›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2013

Care of terminally-ill patients: an opinion survey among critical care healthcare providers in the Middle East.

M ur Rahman, S Abuhasna, F M Abu-Zidan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243041 (A Prospective Study Exploring Factors Affecting ICU Transitions and Handling of Code Status - Insights Into Physician and Family Communication in a Muslim Patient Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243041 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study Exploring Factors Affecting ICU Transitions and Handling of Code Status - Insights Into Physician and Family Communication in a Muslim Patient Population

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled320ConditionsEnd of Life Care, Muslim, Decision Making ,Shared
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Survey of End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units in Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ethical Dilemmas at the End of Life: Islamic Perspective.Journal of religion and health · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ur RahmanTawam Hospital in affiliation with Johns Hopkins, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
S AbuhasnaTawam Hospital in affiliation with Johns Hopkins, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
F M Abu-ZidanTrauma Group, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern medicine has allowed physicians to support the dying terminally-ill patient with artificial means. However, a common dilemma faced by physicians in general, and intensivist in particular is when to limit or withdraw aggressive intervention.

objectiveTo study the effect of training background and seniority on Do-not to resuscitate (DNR) decisions in the Middle East.

methodsAnonymous questionnaire sent to members of the Pan Arab Society of Critical Care.

resultsThe response rate was 46.2%. Most of the responders were Muslim (86%) and consultants (70.9%). Majority of the responders were trained in western countries. Religion played a major role in 59.3% for making the DNR decision. DNR was considered equivalent to comfort care by 39.5%. In a futile case scenario, Do Not Escalate Therapy was preferred (54.7%). The likelihood of a patient, once labeled DNR, being clinically neglected was a concern among 46.5%. Admission of DNR patients to the ICU was acceptable for 47.7%. Almost one-half of the responders (46.5%) wanted physicians to have the ultimate authority in the DNR decision. Training background was a significant factor affecting the interpretation of the term no code DNR (P< 0.008).

conclusionTraining background and level of seniority in critical care provider does not impact opinion on most of end of life issues related to care of terminally-ill patients. However, DNR is considered equivalent to comfort care among majority of Middle Eastern trained physicians.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareDecision MakingResuscitation OrdersTerminally IllFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastSurveys and Questionnairescare of terminally-illDo-not resuscitateIslamopiniontraining

Identifiers

PMID24940309
PMCPMC4056474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.