Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24940051›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2014

Cognitive and affective assessment in day care versus institutionalized elderly patients: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Ana Maseda, Aránzazu Balo, Laura Lorenzo-López, Leire Lodeiro-Fernández, José Luis Rodríguez-Villamil, José Carlos Millán-Calenti

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Dental Program for Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Facilities.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2021
    Article
  5. The Effectiveness of Home Services in Taiwan: A People-Centered Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana MasedaGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Aránzazu BaloGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Laura Lorenzo-LópezGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Leire Lodeiro-FernándezGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
José Luis Rodríguez-VillamilGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
José Carlos Millán-CalentiGerontology Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Universidade da Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCognitive decline and depression are two common mental health problems that may create a need for long-term care among the elderly. In the last decade, the percentage of older adults who receive health care in nursing homes, day care centers, or home support services has increased in Europe. The objectives of this descriptive and nonrandomized longitudinal study were to evaluate and to compare the cognitive and affective evolution of day care versus institutionalized older patients through a 1-year period, and to assess the presence of cognitive and affective impairment as a function of the care setting. PATIENTS AND

methodsNinety-four patients were assessed at baseline, and 63 (67.0%) were reassessed 1 year later. Neuropsychological assessment included measures of cognitive performance (general cognitive status, visuospatial, and language abilities) and affective status (depressive symptoms).

resultsOur findings indicated that the majority of the participants (day care and institutionalized patients) had mild-moderate cognitive impairment at baseline, which significantly increased in both groups after 1-year follow-up. However, the rate of change in global cognitive function did not significantly differ between groups over time. Regarding language abilities, naming function maintained among day care patients in comparison with institutionalized patients, who showed worse performance at follow-up. As regards to affective status, results revealed that institutionalized patients had a significant reduction in depressive symptoms at follow-up, when compared to day care patients. Results also highlight the high frequency of cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms regardless of the care setting.

conclusionOur findings revealed a similar global cognitive decline rate between patients receiving day care services and those residing in a nursing home at the 1-year follow-up, and slightly different trajectories in other outcomes such as naming function and depressive symptoms.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedInstitutionalizationNursing HomesAffectAgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionDay Care, MedicalDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating Scalescognitive and affective assessmentday care elderly patientsinstitutionalized patients

Identifiers

PMID24940051
PMCPMC4051620
OpenAlexW2003597053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.