ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2014
Invited commentary: are there unrealized benefits of unemployment insurance among the employed?
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health effects of unemployment benefit program generosity.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Cylus et al. respond to "unrealized benefits?".American journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Political statements about the relationship between the economy and health intensify during economic downturns and fade in times of prosperity. Population health researchers share this cyclical interest in that the numbers of peer-reviewed publications on this topic increase during and immediately after recessions. In this issue of the Journal, Cylus et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(1):45-52) follow in the "economy and health" research tradition and examine the relationship between US unemployment rates and suicide mortality. Their work makes a novel contribution in that they examine whether generous unemployment insurance benefits attenuate the relationship between economic downturns and suicide mortality in the United States. In this commentary, I assess the internal validity of their analysis, call into question some assumptions of their approach, and place their contribution within the context of the broader literature. I then argue that population-based and individual-based approaches in the "economy and health" field often work in concert to create knowledge and inform policy-makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24939981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.