Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24939981›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2014

Invited commentary: are there unrealized benefits of unemployment insurance among the employed?

Tim A Bruckner

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Health effects of unemployment benefit program generosity.American journal of public health · 2015
    Article
  2. Cylus et al. respond to "unrealized benefits?".American journal of epidemiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tim A Bruckner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Political statements about the relationship between the economy and health intensify during economic downturns and fade in times of prosperity. Population health researchers share this cyclical interest in that the numbers of peer-reviewed publications on this topic increase during and immediately after recessions. In this issue of the Journal, Cylus et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(1):45-52) follow in the "economy and health" research tradition and examine the relationship between US unemployment rates and suicide mortality. Their work makes a novel contribution in that they examine whether generous unemployment insurance benefits attenuate the relationship between economic downturns and suicide mortality in the United States. In this commentary, I assess the internal validity of their analysis, call into question some assumptions of their approach, and place their contribution within the context of the broader literature. I then argue that population-based and individual-based approaches in the "economy and health" field often work in concert to create knowledge and inform policy-makers.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleSuicideUnemploymenteconomicsrecessionsocial epidemiologysuicideunemploymentunemployment insurance

Identifiers

PMID24939981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.