Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24939957›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014

Identification of a duplication within the GDF9 gene and novel candidate genes for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) by a customized high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization platform.

A Norling, A L Hirschberg, K A Rodriguez-Wallberg, E Iwarsson, A Wedell, M Barbaro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Genetics of Non-Syndromic Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic insights into the complexity of premature ovarian insufficiency.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Selected Genetic Factors Associated with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A NorlingDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden ameli.norling@ki.com.
A L HirschbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden.
K A Rodriguez-WallbergDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Section for Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Fertility Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
E IwarssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
A WedellCentre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Centre for Inherited Metabolic Diseases (CMMS), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden.
M BarbaroDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Centre for Inherited Metabolic Diseases (CMMS), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 171 76, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of DNA samples from women with primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) improve the diagnosis of the condition and identify novel candidate genes for POI? SUMMARY ANSWER: A mutation affecting the regulatory region of growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) was identified for the first time together with several novel candidate genes for POI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Most patients with POI do not receive a molecular diagnosis despite a significant genetic component in the pathogenesis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a case-control study. Twenty-six patients were analyzed by array CGH for identification of copy number variants. Novel changes were investigated in 95 controls and in a separate population of 28 additional patients with POI. The experimental procedures were performed during a 1-year period. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsDNA samples from 26 patients with POI were analyzed by a customized 1M array-CGH platform with whole genome coverage and probe enrichment targeting 78 genes in sex development. By PCR amplification and sequencing, the breakpoint of an identified partial GDF9 gene duplication was characterized. A multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) probe set for specific identification of deletions/duplications affecting GDF9 was developed. An MLPA probe set for the identification of additional cases or controls carrying novel candidate regions identified by array-CGH was developed. Sequencing of three candidate genes was performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Eleven unique copy number changes were identified in a total of 11 patients, including a tandem duplication of 475 bp, containing part of the GDF9 gene promoter region. The duplicated region contains three NOBOX-binding elements and an E-box, important for GDF9 gene regulation. This aberration is likely causative of POI. Fifty-four patients were investigated for copy number changes within GDF9, but no additional cases were found. Ten aberrations constituting novel candidate regions were detected, including a second DNAH6 deletion in a patient with POI. Other identified candidate genes were TSPYL6, SMARCC1, CSPG5 and ZFR2. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a descriptive study and no functional experiments were performed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe study illustrates the importance of analyzing small copy number changes in addition to sequence alterations in the genetic investigation of patients with POI. Also, promoter regions should be included in the investigation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research council (project no 12198 to A.W. and project no 20324 to A.L.H.), Stockholm County Council (E.I., A.W. and K.R.W.), Foundation Frimurare Barnhuset (A.N., A.W. and M.B.), Karolinska Institutet (A.N., A.L.H., E.I., A.W. and M.B.), Novo Nordic Foundation (A.W.) and Svenska Läkaresällskapet (M.B.). The funding sources had no involvement in the design or analysis of the study. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DuplicationAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildCohort StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGrowth Differentiation Factor 9HumansPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyGDF9 protein, humanGrowth Differentiation Factor 9array-CGHDNAH6GDF9TSPYL6ZFR2

Identifiers

PMID24939957
PMCPMC4093997
OpenAlexW2139672229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.