Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24939809›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Current practice of venous thromboembolism prevention in acute trusts: a qualitative study.

L McFarland, E Murray, S Harrison, C Heneghan, A Ward, D Fitzmaurice, S Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L McFarlandPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
E MurrayPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
S HarrisonDepartment of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
C HeneghanDepartment of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
A WardDepartment of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
D FitzmauricePrimary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
S GreenfieldPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the current practice of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in acute trusts.

designA qualitative research design was used to explore the perceived current practice of thromboprophylaxis, and knowledge and experience of VTE prevention. Data were collected via interviews with personnel from acute trusts and other relevant organisations and charities. Constant comparison was used to generate themes grounded in the data.

settingThe UK.

participants17 participants, sampled due to their expertise and knowledge in the field of VTE, were interviewed for the study.

resultsNo one felt directly responsible for VTE risk assessment and treatment in acute trusts. There were concerns whether any action takes place based on the risk assessment. Low levels of VTE knowledge existed throughout the system.

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of continuous training to prevent VTE risk assessment being considered a tick box exercise and for clinicians to understand the significance of the procedure to ensure that VTE preventative measures are administered. It is essential that acute trust staff acknowledge that VTE prevention is the responsibility of everyone involved in a patient's care. Concerns remain around prophylaxis treatment, administration and contraindications.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomVenous ThromboembolismQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID24939809
PMCPMC4067865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.