Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24939589›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

Improving accuracy of rare variant imputation with a two-step imputation approach.

Eskil Kreiner-Møller, Carolina Medina-Gomez, André G Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Karol Estrada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Old vs. New Local Ancestry Inference in HCHS/SOL: A Comparative Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genotype imputation in the domestic dog.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eskil Kreiner-Møller1] Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Genetic Laboratory of Internal Medicin, Rotterdam, The Netherlands [2] COPSAC; Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark [3] The Danish Pediatric Asthma Center; Copenhagen University Hospital, Ledreborg Alle 34, Gentofte, Denmark.
Carolina Medina-GomezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Genetic Laboratory of Internal Medicin, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
André G UitterlindenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Genetic Laboratory of Internal Medicin, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fernando RivadeneiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Genetic Laboratory of Internal Medicin, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Karol Estrada1] Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Genetic Laboratory of Internal Medicin, Rotterdam, The Netherlands [2] Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [3] Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation has been the pillar of the success of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for identifying common variants associated with common diseases. However, most GWAS have been run using only 60 HapMap samples as reference for imputation, meaning less frequent and rare variants not being comprehensively scrutinized. Next-generation arrays ensuring sufficient coverage together with new reference panels, as the 1000 Genomes panel, are emerging to facilitate imputation of low frequent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (minor allele frequency (MAF) <5%). In this study, we present a two-step imputation approach improving the quality of the 1000 Genomes imputation by genotyping only a subset of samples to create a local reference population on a dense array with many low-frequency markers. In this approach, the study sample, genotyped with a first generation array, is imputed first to the local reference sample genotyped on a dense array and hereafter to the 1000 Genomes reference panel. We show that mean imputation quality, measured by the r(2) using this approach, increases by 28% for variants with a MAF between 1 and 5% as compared with direct imputation to 1000 Genomes reference. Similarly, the concordance rate between calls of imputed and true genotypes was found to be significantly higher for heterozygotes (P<1e-15) and rare homozygote calls (P<1e-15) in this low frequency range. The two-step approach in our setting improves imputation quality compared with traditional direct imputation noteworthy in the low-frequency spectrum and is a cost-effective strategy in large epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesAgedAllelesGene FrequencyHumansMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24939589
PMCPMC4326719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.