Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2493932›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1989

Assessment of DNA fingerprinting for rapid identification of outbreaks of systemic candidiasis.

R Matthews, J Burnie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans colonization and fungemia in very low birthweight infants.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses · 1993
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Impact of the changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the 1990s.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1992
    Review
  15. Candida strains from neonates in a special care baby unit.Archives of disease in childhood · 1992
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R MatthewsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.
J Burnie

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA fingerprinting was assessed as an improved typing system for Candida albicans aimed at speeding the implementation of cross infection control measures in outbreaks of systemic candidiasis. The study was carried out with 45 previously characterised isolates from five different outbreaks and with 96 unrelated isolates from a mixed control population. Sixteen different genotypes were produced. Results were obtainable within days, reproducibility was high, and there was good discrimination among different outbreaks. Compared with existing typing systems DNA fingerprinting provides a robust system that may be used rapidly to identify outbreaks of nosocomial candidiasis in laboratories with no specialist skill in typing C albicans.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksCandida albicansCandidiasisCross InfectionDNA, FungalElectrophoresisHumansImmunoblottingLondonNucleotide MappingDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID2493932
PMCPMC1835742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.