GuidelineSurgical endoscopy2014
SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.
Guideline in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Why laparoscopists may opt for three-dimensional view: a summary of the full HTA report on 3D versus 2D laparoscopy by S.I.C.E. (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie).Surgical endoscopy · 2018Pooled it
- Implementing Medical Technological Equipment in the OR: Factors for Successful Implementations.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2018Pooled it
- Implementation of a single-port robotic platform into your colorectal surgery practice: a SAGES colorectal committee task force review of evolving robotic technology and innovations.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- From Evaluation to Implementation: A Delphi Consensus Framework with Domain-Weighted Decision Models for Robotic Surgery Adoption.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- White paper: robotic cholecystectomy-new technology but safe principles still apply.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Factors influencing use of robotic approaches in bariatric surgery: A qualitative study.Current problems in surgery · 2025Article
- Monitoring the safe delivery of new invasive interventional procedures and devices: an analysis of NHS organisation policies.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of Advanced Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Outcomes for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Delphi Consensus Definition of Diagnostic Yield and Recommendations for Patient-centered Study Designs. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Enhanced U-Net with GridMask (EUGNet): A Novel Approach for Robotic Surgical Tool Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review.BJS open · 2023Article
- Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies.The British journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Potential Value of Haptic Feedback in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.Surgical innovation · 2020Article
- Informed consent: a shared decision-making process that creates a new professional obligation for care.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Review
- Introduction of new techniques and technologies in surgery: Where is transanal total mesorectal excision today?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Review
- Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020Article
- Mixed reality navigation system for ultrasound-guided percutaneous punctures: a pre-clinical evaluation.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a single-surgeon setting: refinements of the technique during the learning phase.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24939155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.