Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24938865›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2014

Multi-view singular value decomposition for disease subtyping and genetic associations.

Jiangwen Sun, Jinbo Bi, Henry R Kranzler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Robust integrative biclustering for multi-view data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unsupervised Algorithms for Microarray Sample Stratification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. A Survey on Multi-View Clustering.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangwen Sun
Jinbo BiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Way, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. jinbo@engr.uconn.edu.
Henry R Kranzler
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Deep sequencing studies for cannabis and stimulant dependenceR01DA030976 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EHLERS, CINDY L, GELERNTER, JOEL · 2010 to 2014
$16.5M
Sex-specific analysis of opioid dependence GWAS and beyondR01DA012690 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2000 to 2017
$14.0M
GENETICS OF COCAINE DEPENDENCER01DA012849 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1999 to 2010
$11.5M
Linkage Disequilibrium Studies of Alcohol DependenceR01AA011330 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1997 to 2013
$6.4M
Genetics of Cocaine DependenceR01DA018432 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KRANZLER, HENRY RICHARD · 2006 to 2010
$3.5M
Genetics of Alcohol Dependence in African-AmericansR01AA017535 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA011330NIAAA NIH HHS AA017535NIDA NIH HHS DA030976NIDA NIH HHS DA12690NIDA NIH HHS DA12849NIDA NIH HHS DA18432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate classification of patients with a complex disease into subtypes has important implications for medicine and healthcare. Using more homogeneous disease subtypes in genetic association analysis will facilitate the detection of new genetic variants that are not detectible using the non-differentiated disease phenotype. Subtype differentiation can also improve diagnostic classification, which can in turn inform clinical decision making and treatment matching. Currently, the most sophisticated methods for disease subtyping perform cluster analysis using patients' clinical features. Without guidance from genetic information, the resultant subtypes are likely to be suboptimal and efforts at genetic association may fail.

resultsWe propose a multi-view matrix decomposition approach that integrates clinical features with genetic markers to detect confirmatory evidence for a disease subtype. This approach groups patients into clusters that are consistent between the clinical and genetic dimensions of data; it simultaneously identifies the clinical features that define the subtype and the genotypes associated with the subtype. A simulation study validated the proposed approach, showing that it identified hypothesized subtypes and associated features. In comparison to the latest biclustering and multi-view data analytics using real-life disease data, the proposed approach identified clinical subtypes of a disease that differed from each other more significantly in the genetic markers, thus demonstrating the superior performance of the proposed approach.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm is an effective and superior alternative to the disease subtyping methods employed to date. Integration of phenotypic features with genetic markers in the subtyping analysis is a promising approach to identify concurrently disease subtypes and their genetic associations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDiseaseGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID24938865
PMCPMC4077642
OpenAlexW2051103587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.