ArticleBMC genetics2014
Multi-view singular value decomposition for disease subtyping and genetic associations.
Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction analysis identifies bacterial vaginosis-associated metabolic interactions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Robust integrative biclustering for multi-view data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- A Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Model With Screening of Genetic Associations to Guide Disease Subtyping.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Unsupervised Algorithms for Microarray Sample Stratification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- A Survey on Multi-View Clustering.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Approaches to Defining Common and Dissociable Neurobiological Deficits Associated With Psychopathology in Youth.Biological psychiatry · 2020Review
- Multi-parametric and multi-regional histogram analysis of MRI: modality integration reveals imaging phenotypes of glioblastoma.European radiology · 2019Article
- Multi-View Cluster Analysis with Incomplete Data to Understand Treatment Effects.Information sciences · 2019Article
- A cross-species bi-clustering approach to identifying conserved co-regulated genes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- African-specific variability in the acetylcholine muscarinic receptor M4: association with cocaine and heroin addiction.Pharmacogenomics · 2016Article
- MVDA: a multi-view genomic data integration methodology.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Alcohol Dependence Genetics: Lessons Learned From Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and Post-GWAS Analyses.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate classification of patients with a complex disease into subtypes has important implications for medicine and healthcare. Using more homogeneous disease subtypes in genetic association analysis will facilitate the detection of new genetic variants that are not detectible using the non-differentiated disease phenotype. Subtype differentiation can also improve diagnostic classification, which can in turn inform clinical decision making and treatment matching. Currently, the most sophisticated methods for disease subtyping perform cluster analysis using patients' clinical features. Without guidance from genetic information, the resultant subtypes are likely to be suboptimal and efforts at genetic association may fail.
resultsWe propose a multi-view matrix decomposition approach that integrates clinical features with genetic markers to detect confirmatory evidence for a disease subtype. This approach groups patients into clusters that are consistent between the clinical and genetic dimensions of data; it simultaneously identifies the clinical features that define the subtype and the genotypes associated with the subtype. A simulation study validated the proposed approach, showing that it identified hypothesized subtypes and associated features. In comparison to the latest biclustering and multi-view data analytics using real-life disease data, the proposed approach identified clinical subtypes of a disease that differed from each other more significantly in the genetic markers, thus demonstrating the superior performance of the proposed approach.
conclusionsThe proposed algorithm is an effective and superior alternative to the disease subtyping methods employed to date. Integration of phenotypic features with genetic markers in the subtyping analysis is a promising approach to identify concurrently disease subtypes and their genetic associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.