Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24938769›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2014

Case management for frequent users of the emergency department: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Patrick Bodenmann, Venetia-Sofia Velonaki, Ornella Ruggeri, Olivier Hugli, Bernard Burnand, Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen, Karine Moschetti, Katia Iglesias, Stéphanie Baggio, Jean-Bernard Daeppen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01934322 (Case Management for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01934322 nacompletednot on this map

Case Management for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LausanneRan2012 to 2014Enrolled250ConditionsFrequent Users of the Emergency Department, Vulnerable PopulationsArmsCase Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patrick BodenmannDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland. Patrick.Bodenmann@hospvd.ch.
Venetia-Sofia Velonaki
Ornella Ruggeri
Olivier Hugli
Bernard Burnand
Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen
Karine Moschetti
Katia Iglesias
Stéphanie Baggio
Jean-Bernard Daeppen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe devised a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of an intervention based on case management care for frequent emergency department users. The aim of the intervention is to reduce such patients' emergency department use, to improve their quality of life, and to reduce costs consequent on frequent use. The intervention consists of a combination of comprehensive case management care and standard emergency care. It uses a clinical case management model that is patient-identified, patient-directed, and developed to provide high intensity services. It provides a continuum of hospital- and community-based patient services, which include clinical assessment, outreach referral, and coordination and communication with other service providers. METHODS/

designWe aim to recruit, during the first year of the study, 250 patients who visit the emergency department of the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. Eligible patients will have visited the emergency department 5 or more times during the previous 12 months. Randomisation of the participants to the intervention or control groups will be computer generated and concealed. The statistician and each patient will be blinded to the patient's allocation. Participants in the intervention group (N = 125), additionally to standard emergency care, will receive case management from a team, 1 (ambulatory care) to 3 (hospitalization) times during their stay and after 1, 3, and 5 months, at their residence, in the hospital or in the ambulatory care setting. In between the consultations provided, the patients will have the opportunity to contact, at any moment, the case management team. Participants in the control group (N = 125) will receive standard emergency care only. Data will be collected at baseline and 2, 5.5, 9, and 12 months later, including: number of emergency department visits, quality of life (EuroQOL and WHOQOL), health services use, and relevant costs. Data on feelings of discrimination and patient's satisfaction will also be collected at the baseline and 12 months later. DISCUSSION: Our study will help to clarify knowledge gaps regarding the positive outcomes (emergency department visits, quality of life, efficiency, and cost-utility) of an intervention based on case management care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01934322.

Indexed as

Case ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services MisuseHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID24938769
PMCPMC4071797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.