ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015
The role of concentration-effect relationships in the assessment of QTc interval prolongation.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Cardiac Safety of Long-Acting Endectocide Moxidectin in a Randomized Concentration-QT Study.Clinical and translational science · 2018Trial
- An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating concentration-QT study to investigate the cardiac effects and safety of paroxetine in healthy adults.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Dynamics of the QTc interval over a 24-h dose interval after start of intravenous ciprofloxacin or low-dose erythromycin administration in ICU patients.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Observational
- Can non-clinical repolarization assays predict the results of clinical thorough QT studies? Results from a research consortium.British journal of pharmacology · 2018Article
- Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2018Review
- Combinations of QTc-prolonging drugs: towards disentangling pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in their potentially additive nature.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2017Article
- Investigating the Additive Interaction of QT-Prolonging Drugs in Older People Using Claims Data.Drug safety · 2017Article
- Translating QT interval prolongation from conscious dogs to humans.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Characterizing QT interval prolongation in early clinical development: a case study with methadone.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2017Article
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of drug-induced QTc interval prolongation in man: prediction from in vitro human ether-à-go-go-related gene binding and functional inhibition assays and conscious dog studies.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Levofloxacin-Induced QTc Prolongation Depends on the Time of Drug Administration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016Article
- Assessment of Interspecies Differences in Drug-Induced QTc Interval Prolongation in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Dogs and Humans.Pharmaceutical research · 2016Article
- The role of concentration--effect relationships in the QTc interval prolongation: case sotalol.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- On the role of concentration-effect relationships in safety pharmacology: only the dose makes a drug not to be poison!British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Top-down, Bottom-up and Middle-out Strategies for Drug Cardiac Safety Assessment via Modeling and Simulations.Current pharmacology reportsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling has been widely used in clinical research. Yet, its application in the evaluation of cardiovascular safety remains limited, particularly in the evaluation of pro-arrhythmic effects. Here we discuss the advantages of disadvantages of population PKPD modelling and simulation, a paradigm built around the knowledge of the concentration-effect relationship as the basis for decision making in drug development and its utility as a guide to drug safety. A wide-ranging review of the literature was performed on the experimental protocols currently used to characterize the potential for QT interval prolongation, both pre-clinically and clinically. Focus was given to the role of modelling and simulation for design optimization and subsequent analysis and interpretation of the data, discriminating drug from system specific properties. Cardiovascular safety remains one of the major sources of attrition in drug development with stringent regulatory requirements. However, despite the myriad of tests, data are not integrated systematically to ensure accurate translation of the observed drug effects in clinically relevant conditions. The thorough QT study addresses a critical regulatory question but does not necessarily reflect knowledge of the underlying pharmacology and has limitations in its ability to address fundamental clinical questions. It is also prone to issues of multiplicity. Population approaches offer a paradigm for the evaluation of drug safety built around the knowledge of the concentration-effect relationship. It enables quantitative assessment of the probability of QTc interval prolongation in patients, providing better guidance to regulatory labelling and understanding of benefit/risk in specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.