ArticleObesity surgery2014
Volume of resected stomach as a predictor of excess weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development and Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos: A Review and Comparison of Academic and Online Video Resources.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Sleeve Gastrectomy Weight Loss and the Preoperative and Postoperative Predictors: a Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Does antrum size matter in sleeve gastrectomy? A prospective randomized study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Resected gastric volume/number of staplers fired ratio as a tool in predicting complication and midterm results in sleeve gastrectomy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Radiographic Measurement of Gastric Remnant Volume After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Assessment of Reproducibility and Correlation with Weight Loss.Obesity surgery · 2022Article
- Impact of Resection Volume/Stapler Firings-Ratio on Perioperative Complications and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Correlation Between Preoperative Gastric Volume and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Impact of Resected Gastric Volume on Postoperative Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- High Resected Gastric Volume and poorly controlled DM2 in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018Article
- 3D Volumetry and its Correlation Between Postoperative Gastric Volume and Excess Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- Predictability of first-year weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Changes in Gastric Volume and Their Implications for Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2017Observational
- Effect of Resected Gastric Volume on Ghrelin and GLP-1 Plasma Levels: a Prospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Observational
- Influence of the Resected Gastric Volume on the Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gaining popularity for the treatment of obesity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the volume of the resected stomach (VRS) as a predictor of the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) 1 year after LSG.
methodsThis was a single-surgeon study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent LSG at Jordan University Hospital (February 2009 to February 2012). The VRS was measured using a standardized technique. The %EWL was calculated at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The correlation between the VRS and %EWL was statistically evaluated.
resultsNinety patients underwent LSG during the study period. Of these, 73 patients (57 female) completed at least 1 year of follow-up and were analyzed; their body mass index was 45 ± 7.6 kg/m(2) (33-81). The VRS was 1,337.4 ± 435.2 ml (600-2,800). The %EWL was 33.6 ± 11.1 % at 3 months, 48.6 ± 15.5 % at 6 months, and 56.8 ± 18.9 % at 12 months. A significant correlation was observed between the VRS and %EWL at 1 year (p = 0.003). Patients with a VRS of >1,100 ml (n = 43) achieved significantly greater %EWL at 12 months than did those with a VRS of ≤ 1,100 (n = 30). Removal of >1,100 ml of gastric volume was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.5 and 46.2 %, respectively, for achieving a %EWL of ≥ 50 %.
conclusionThe VRS can be used as an indicator of excess weight loss 1 year after LSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24938678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.