ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2014
MicroRNA target prediction: theory and practice.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated miRNA/mRNA Counter-Expression Analysis Highlights Oxidative Stress-Related GenesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Unveiling ncRNA regulatory axes in atherosclerosis progression.Clinical and translational medicine · 2020Review
- miR-206 inhibits FN1 expression and proliferation and promotes apoptosis of rat type II alveolar epithelial cells.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study is one of the few that includes tissue samples in the evaluation of target prediction algorithms designed to detect microRNA (miRNA) sequences that might interact with particular messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences. Twelve different target prediction tools were used to find miRNA sequences that might interact with CCL20 gene expression. Different algorithms predicted controversial miRNA sequences for CCL20 regulation due to a different weighting of parameters. Hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-145 suggested by four or more programs were chosen for further investigation. Possible real interaction of these miRNA sequences with CCL20 gene expression was monitored using luciferase assays and expression analyses of tissue samples of colorectal adenocarcinoma by either qRT-PCR or ELISA. Folding status of seed-binding sites in complete mRNA and 3'UTR of CCL20 was predicted. Prediction of miRNA expression was attempted based on CCL20 expression data. Eight of the target prediction tools forecasted a role for hsa-miR-21 and four mentioned hsa-miR-145 in CCL20 gene regulation. Laboratory experimentation showed that CCL20 may serve as a target of hsa-miR-21 but not hsa-miR-145. Expression of the molecules resulted in no clear assertion. Folding of seed-binding sites was predicted to be relatively constant for the complete mRNA and 3'UTR. Predicting miRNA expression based on target gene expression was impossible. This might be attributable to the fact that effects of miRNA activity may oscillate between gene product repression and activation. Additional systematic studies are needed to address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.