Trial reportBMC health services research2014
Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Pooled it
- Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Practitioner perspectives on implementing a quality improvement intervention for telephone-based therapy in NHS Talking Therapies: a qualitative process evaluation study.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Assessing a facilitated social network intervention for health outcomes in lonely and socially isolated people: the pragmatic, cluster-randomized PALS trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- ' … You become a prisoner of your life': A qualitative study exploring the experience of joint pain and accessing care in Hai, Tanzania.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2024Article
- Theories used to develop or evaluate social prescribing in studies: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Applying Structural Equation Modelling to Understand the Implementation of Social Distancing in the Professional Lives of Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to develop an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates for self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Acceptability of a cessation intervention for pregnant smokers: a qualitative study guided by Normalization Process Theory.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Self-management interventions for adults with chronic kidney disease: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Supporting patients self-managing respiratory health: a qualitative study on the impact of the Breathe Easy voluntary group network.ERJ open research · 2018Article
- Preparing the prescription: a review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes.BMJ open · 2017Review
- Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Implementation, context and complexity.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
- Self-management support from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Review
- Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention.BMC health services research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent initiatives to target the personal, social and clinical needs of people with long-term health conditions have had limited impact within primary care. Evidence of the importance of social networks to support people with long-term conditions points to the need for self-management approaches which align personal circumstances with valued activities. The Patient-Led Assessment for Network Support (PLANS) intervention is a needs-led assessment for patients to prioritise their health and social needs and provide access to local community services and activities. Exploring the work and practices of patients and telephone workers are important for understanding and evaluating the workability and implementation of new interventions.
methodsQualitative methods (interviews, focus group, observations) were used to explore the experience of PLANS from the perspectives of participants and the telephone support workers who delivered it (as part of an RCT) and the reasons why the intervention worked or not. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used as a sensitising tool to evaluate: the relevance of PLANS to patients (coherence); the processes of engagement (cognitive participation); the work done for PLANS to happen (collective action); the perceived benefits and costs of PLANS (reflexive monitoring). 20 patients in the intervention arm of a clinical trial were interviewed and their telephone support calls were recorded and a focus group with 3 telephone support workers was conducted.
resultsAnalysis of the interviews, support calls and focus group identified three themes in relation to the delivery and experience of PLANS. These are: formulation of 'health' in the context of everyday life; trajectories and tipping points: disrupting everyday routines; precarious trust in networks. The relevance of these themes are considered using NPT constructs in terms of the work that is entailed in engaging with PLANS, taking action, and who is implicated this process.
conclusionsPLANS gives scope to align long-term condition management to everyday life priorities and valued aspects of life. This approach can improve engagement with health-relevant practices by situating them within everyday contexts. This has potential to increase utilisation of local resources with potential cost-saving benefits for the NHS.
trial registrationISRCTN45433299.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.