Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24938443›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2014

Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.

Dominique Tremblay, Nassera Touati, Danièle Roberge, Jean-Louis Denis, Annie Turcotte, Benoît Samson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How oncology teams can be patient-centred? opportunities for theoretical improvement through an empirical examination.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient-Centered Cancer Care Programs in Italy: Benchmarking Global Patient Education Initiatives.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominique TremblayCharles-Le Moyne Hospital Research Centre, Greenfield Park, QC J4K 0A8, Canada. dominique.tremblay2@usherbrooke.ca.
Nassera Touati
Danièle Roberge
Jean-Louis Denis
Annie Turcotte
Benoît Samson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterdisciplinary teamwork (ITW) is designed to promote the active participation of several disciplines in delivering comprehensive cancer care to patients. ITW provides mechanisms to support continuous communication among care providers, optimize professionals' participation in clinical decision-making within and across disciplines, and foster care coordination along the cancer trajectory. However, ITW mechanisms are not activated optimally by all teams, resulting in a gap between desired outcomes of ITW and actual outcomes observed. The aim of the present study is to identify the conditions underlying outcome production by ITW in local oncology teams.

methodsThis retrospective multiple case study will draw upon realist evaluation principles to explore associations among context, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO). The cases are nine interdisciplinary cancer teams that participated in a previous study evaluating ITW outcomes. Qualitative data sources will be used to construct a picture of CMO associations in each case. For data collection, reflexive focus groups will be held to capture patients' and professionals' perspectives on ITW, using the guiding question, 'What works, for whom, and under what circumstances?' Intra-case analysis will be used to trace associations between context, ITW mechanisms, and patient outcomes. Inter-case analysis will be used to compare the different cases' CMO associations for a better understanding of the phenomenon under study. DISCUSSION: This multiple case study will use realist evaluation principles to draw lessons about how certain contexts are more or less likely to produce particular outcomes. The results will make it possible to target more specifically the actions required to optimize structures and to activate the best mechanisms to meet the needs of cancer patients. This project could also contribute significantly to the development of improved research methods for conducting realist evaluations of complex healthcare interventions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use CMO associations to improved empirical and theoretical understanding of interdisciplinary teamwork in oncology, and its results could foster more effective implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingClinical ProtocolsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInterprofessional RelationsNeoplasmsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamQuebecResearch DesignRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24938443
PMCPMC4074333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.