Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24938434›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2014

Methylation of PITX2, HOXD3, RASSF1 and TDRD1 predicts biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer.

Kirill Litovkin, Steven Joniau, Evelyne Lerut, Annouschka Laenen, Olivier Gevaert, Martin Spahn, Burkhard Kneitz, Sofie Isebaert, Karin Haustermans, Monique Beullens and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BaySyn: Bayesian Evidence Synthesis for Multi-system Multiomic Integration.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA methylation profiles in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Predictive Value ofDisease markers · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kirill LitovkinLaboratory of Biosignaling and Therapeutics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, k.litovkin@yahoo.com.
Steven Joniau
Evelyne Lerut
Annouschka Laenen
Olivier Gevaert
Martin Spahn
Burkhard Kneitz
Sofie Isebaert
Karin Haustermans
Monique Beullens
Aleyde Van Eynde
Mathieu Bollen
KU Leuven · BECenter for Systems Biology · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore differential methylation of HAAO, HOXD3, LGALS3, PITX2, RASSF1 and TDRD1 as a molecular tool to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsA multiplexed nested methylation-specific PCR was applied to quantify promoter methylation of the selected markers in five cell lines, 42 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 71 high-risk PCa tumor samples. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the importance of the methylation level in predicting BCR.

resultsA PCa-specific methylation marker HAAO in combination with HOXD3 and a hypomethylation marker TDRD1 distinguished PCa samples (>90 % of tumor cells each) from BPH with a sensitivity of 0.99 and a specificity of 0.95. High methylation of PITX2, HOXD3 and RASSF1, as well as low methylation of TDRD1, appeared to be significantly associated with a higher risk for BCR (HR 3.96, 3.44, 2.80 and 2.85, correspondingly) after correcting for established risk factors. When DNA methylation was treated as a continuous variable, a two-gene model PITX2 × 0.020677 + HOXD3 × 0.0043132 proved to be the best predictor of BCR (HR 4.85) compared with the individual markers. This finding was confirmed in an independent set of 52 high-risk PCa tumor samples (HR 11.89).

conclusionsDifferential promoter methylation of HOXD3, PITX2, RASSF1 and TDRD1 emerges as an independent predictor of BCR in high-risk PCa patients. A two-gene continuous DNA methylation model "PITX2 × 0.020677 + HOXD3 × 0.0043132" is a better predictor of BCR compared with individual markers.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedAged, 80 and overCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorHomeobox Protein PITX2Homeodomain ProteinsHumansKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPromoter Regions, GeneticProportional Hazards ModelsProstate-Specific AntigenCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsHomeobox Protein PITX2Homeodomain ProteinsHOXA4 protein, humanKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenRASSF1 protein, humanTDRD1 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24938434
PMCPMC11824121
OpenAlexW2075438241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.