ArticleInternational journal of hematology2014
Treatment outcomes of adolescent acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group (TCCSG) clinical trials.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Multicenter clinical trial of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in elder children and adolescents].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018Trial
- Outcome of adolescent patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with pediatric protocols.International journal of hematology · 2015Trial
- Functional characterization of a germline ETV6 variant associated with inherited thrombocytopenia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and salivary gland carcinoma in childhood.International journal of hematology · 2020Article
- Glucocorticoids attenuate the sensitivity of glucocorticoid-resistant lymphoid cells to doxorubicin via reduction in OCTN2.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2019Article
- Characterization of pediatric Philadelphia-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with kinase fusions in Japan.Blood cancer journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no standard treatment for adolescents aged 15 years or older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), although this age group has been reported as having a poorer prognosis compared to younger patients. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of three consecutive Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group ALL trials (1995-2006) of 373 patients aged 10 years or older, with particular focus on adolescents aged 15-18 years (older-adolescents n = 41), compared to those aged 10-14 years (younger-adolescents n = 332). The probability of event-free survival at 8 years was 67.5 ± 7.4 % for the older-adolescents and 66.5 ± 2.6 % for the younger-adolescents (p = 0.95). Overall survival was 70.7 ± 7.1 % for the older-adolescents and 74.3 ± 2.4 % for the younger-adolescents (p = 0.48). The differences between groups in relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and death rate during induction were not statistically significant, although the older-adolescents trended towards a higher frequency of having stem-cell transplantation during the first remission. In conclusion, our treatment strategy, which consists of intensive induction and block-type consolidation, provided improved outcomes for patients aged 15-18 years, comparable to those for patients aged 10-14 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.