Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24938313›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2014

Clinical trials involving cats: what factors affect owner participation?

Margaret E Gruen, Katrina N Jiamachello, Andrea Thomson, B Duncan X Lascelles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The beneficial role of companion animals in translational pain research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Attitudes of small animal practitioners toward participation in veterinary clinical trials.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2017
    Article
  8. Cats, Cancer and Comparative Oncology.Veterinary sciences · 2015
    Review
  9. Feline clinical trials: considerations for improving recruitment.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margaret E GruenComparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA Behavioral Medicine Service, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA megruen@ncsu.edu.
Katrina N JiamachelloComparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA.
Andrea ThomsonComparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA.
B Duncan X LascellesComparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA.

Funding

Comparative Medicine and Translational Research Training ProgramT32OD011130 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Lauren Virginia Schnabel · 2012 to 2026
$7.8M
NIH HHS T32 OD011130NIH HHS T32OD011130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study rationaleClinical trials are frequently hindered by difficulties in recruiting eligible participants, increasing the timeline and limiting generalizability of results. In veterinary medicine, where proxy enrollment is required, no studies have detailed what factors influence owner participation in clinical trials involving cats. We aimed to investigate these factors through a survey of owners at first opinion practices. PROTOCOL: The survey was designed using feedback from a pilot study and input from clinical researchers. Owners were asked demographic questions and whether they would, would not, or were unsure about participating in a clinical trial with their cat. They then ranked the importance and influence of various factors on participation using a five-point Likert-type scale, and incentives from most to least encouraging. A total of 413 surveys were distributed to cat owners at four hospitals, two feline-only and two multi-species; 88.6% were completed. Data for importance and influence factors as well as incentive rankings were analyzed overall, and by hospital type, location and whether owners would consider participating.

findingsThe most influential factors were trust in the organization, benefit to the cat and veterinarian recommendation. Importance and influence factors varied by willingness to participate. Ranked incentives were not significantly different across groups, with 'Free Services' ranked highest. RELEVANCE: This study provides a first look at what factors influence participation in clinical trials with cats. Given the importance placed in the recommendation of veterinarians, continued work is needed to determine veterinarian-related factors affecting clinical trial participation. The results provide guidance towards improved clinical trial design, promotion and education.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsClinical Trials as TopicPilot ProjectsVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID24938313
PMCPMC4281936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.