Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24937680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Inpatient coronary angiography and revascularisation following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in patients with renal impairment: a cohort study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project.

Catriona Shaw, Dorothea Nitsch, Retha Steenkamp, Cornelia Junghans, Sapna Shah, Donal O'Donoghue, Damian Fogarty, Clive Weston, Claire C Sharpe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Catriona ShawUK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom; Department of Renal Sciences, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dorothea NitschLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Retha SteenkampUK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Cornelia JunghansDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sapna ShahDepartment of Renal Medicine, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Donal O'DonoghueDepartment of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom.
Damian FogartyDepartment of Renal Medicine, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Clive WestonMyocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Claire C SharpeDepartment of Renal Sciences, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Vanderbilt-Emory-Cornell-Duke Consortium for Global Health Fellows (VECDor)R25TW009337 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT, VERMUND, STEN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational guidelines support an early invasive management strategy (including early coronary angiography and revascularisation) for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients with renal impairment. However, evidence from outside the UK suggests that this approach is underutilised. We aimed to describe practice within the NHS, and to determine whether the severity of renal dysfunction influenced the provision of angiography and modified the association between early revascularisation and survival.

methodsWe performed a cohort study, using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score analyses, of data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project for patients presenting with NSTE-ACS to English or Welsh hospitals between 2008 and 2010.

findingsOf 35 881 patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS, eGFR of <60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) was present in 15 680 (43.7%). There was a stepwise decline in the odds of undergoing inpatient angiography with worsening renal dysfunction. Compared with an eGFR>90 ml/minute/1.73 m(2), patients with an eGFR between 45-59 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) were 33% less likely to undergo angiography (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81); those with an eGFR<30/minute/1.73 m(2) had a 64% reduction in odds of undergoing angiography (adjusted OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.29-0.43). Of 16 646 patients who had inpatient coronary angiography, 58.5% underwent inpatient revascularisation. After adjusting for co-variables, inpatient revascularisation was associated with approximately a 30% reduction in death within 1 year compared with those managed medically after coronary angiography (adjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.57-0.77), with no evidence of modification by renal function (p(interaction) = 0.744).

interpretationEarly revascularisation may offer a similar survival benefit in patients with and without renal dysfunction, yet renal impairment is an important determinant of the provision of coronary angiography following NSTE-ACS. A randomised controlled trial is needed to evaluate the efficacy of an early invasive approach in patients with severe renal dysfunction to ensure that all patients who may benefit are offered this treatment option.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial IschemiaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPropensity ScoreRenal Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID24937680
PMCPMC4061061
OpenAlexW1985266882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.