Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24937374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2014

Cellular response of the rat brain to single doses of (137)Cs γ rays does not predict its response to prolonged 'biologically equivalent' fractionated doses.

Dana M Greene-Schloesser, Mitra Kooshki, Valerie Payne, Ralph B D'Agostino, Kenneth T Wheeler, Linda J Metheny-Barlow, Mike E Robbins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Changes in Imaging and Cognition in Juvenile Rats After Whole-Brain Irradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Introduction to Michael E. Robbins memorial issue.International journal of radiation biology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana M Greene-SchloesserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, North Carolina , USA.
Mitra Kooshki
Valerie Payne
Ralph B D'Agostino
Kenneth T Wheeler
Linda J Metheny-Barlow
Mike E Robbins
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
PPARs and Radiation-induced Brain InjuryR01CA112593 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLACKSTOCK, ARTHUR W, METHENY-BARLOW, LINDA J · 2004 to 2013
$3.0M
Training Program in Translational Radiation OncologyT32CA113267 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLACKSTOCK, ARTHUR W · 2005 to 2014
$2.6M
The Renin-Angiotensin System, Inflammation and Radiation-induced Brain InjuryR01CA122318 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROBBINS, MICHAEL E. · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA112593NCI NIH HHS CA122318NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112593NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122318NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113267NCI NIH HHS T32-CA113267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if the brain's response to single doses predicts its response to 'biologically equivalent' fractionated doses.

methodsYoung adult male Fischer 344 rats were whole-brain irradiated with either single 11, 14, or 16.5 Gy doses of (137)Cs γ rays or their 'biologically equivalent' 20, 30, or 40 Gy fractionated doses (fWBI) delivered in 5 Gy fractions, twice/week for 2, 3, or 4 weeks, respectively. At 2 months post-irradiation, cellular markers of inflammation (total, activated, and newborn microglia) and neurogenesis (newborn neurons) were measured in 40 μm sections of the dentate gyrus (DG).

resultsAlthough the total number of microglia in the DG/hilus was not significantly different (p > 0.7) in unirradiated, single dose, and fWBI rats, single doses produced a significant (p < 0.003) increase in the percent-activated microglia; fWBI did not (p > 0.1). Additionally, single doses produced a significant (p < 0.002) dose-dependent increase in surviving newborn microglia; fWBI did not (p < 0.8). Although total proliferation in the DG was reduced equally by single and fWBI doses, single doses produced a significant dose-dependent (p < 0.02) decrease in surviving newborn neurons; fWBI did not (p > 0.6).

conclusionsThese data demonstrate that the rat brain's cellular response to single doses often does not predict its cellular response to 'biologically equivalent' fWBI doses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell ProliferationCesium RadioisotopesDentate GyrusDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGamma RaysHippocampusInflammationMaleMicrogliaNeurogenesisNeuronsRadionuclide ImagingRatsCesium RadioisotopesBrain irradiationfractionated dose responsesinflammationneurogenesissingle dose responses

Identifiers

PMID24937374
PMCPMC4326093
OpenAlexW2002783554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.