ArticleHuman gene therapy2014
Modeling promising nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens in nonhuman primates.
Article in Human gene therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficient manufacturing and engraftment ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Antibody based conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Stem cell-derived CAR T cells traffic to HIV reservoirs in macaques.JCI insight · 2021Article
- DNA Barcoding in Nonhuman Primates Reveals Important Limitations in Retrovirus Integration Site Analysis.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Article
- Targeting the niche: depleting haemopoietic stem cells with targeted therapy.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
- A distinct hematopoietic stem cell population for rapid multilineage engraftment in nonhuman primates.Science translational medicine · 2017Article
- Non-genotoxic conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a hematopoietic-cell-specific internalizing immunotoxin.Nature biotechnology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal conditioning or even no conditioning would be the preferred preparation for most gene therapy applications for nonmalignant diseases. However, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in patients with nonhematologic malignancies have not led to long-term engraftment unless a selective advantage was present for the transplanted donor cells. Similar findings have also been observed in a number of large animal studies. Inadequate myelosuppression levels were thought to be responsible for the outcomes. To address this issue several innovative protocols in small animals have been presented with selective hematopoietic myelosuppression and less systemic toxicity. Such protocols promised to curb the transplant-related morbidity and mortality in myeloablative conditioning and provide effective long-term engraftment, especially in patients with gene-corrected autografts. In the present study we have tested some of these promising RIC regimens in nonhuman primates, a clinically relevant large animal model. Our data suggest that transient myelosuppression induced by anti-c-Kit antibody in conjunction with low-dose irradiation may lead to long-term engraftment, albeit at low levels. The animals with busulfan conditioning with or without anti-c-Kit that received gene-modified autologous transplants with green fluorescent protein expression had similar myelosuppression, but failed long-term engraftment and despite immunosuppressive treatment had all the hallmarks seen previously in similar models without immunosuppression. Our preliminary data expand current knowledge of RIC and emphasize the need to explore whether specific and directed myelosuppression alone is adequate in the absence of microenvironmental modulation, or whether innovative combinations are necessary for safe and effective engraftment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.