ArticleAccounts of chemical research2014
Recent advances toward a general purpose linear-scaling quantum force field.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic and Nuclear Quantum Effects on Proton Transfer Reactions of Guanine-Thymine (G-T) Mispairs Using Combined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical and Machine Learning Potentials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Surface-Accelerated String Method for Locating Minimum Free Energy Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Multipole Expansion of Atomic Electron Density Fluctuation Interactions in the Density-Functional Tight-Binding Method.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- Development of Range-Corrected Deep Learning Potentials for Fast, Accurate Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Simulations of Chemical Reactions in Solution.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- GPU algorithms for density matrix methods on MOPAC: linear scaling electronic structure calculations for large molecular systems.Journal of molecular modeling · 2020Article
- Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Workflows and performances in the ranking prediction of 2016 D3R Grand Challenge 2: lessons learned from a collaborative effort.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- Intermolecular interactions in the condensed phase: Evaluation of semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods.The Journal of chemical physics · 2017Article
- Quantum mechanical force fields for condensed phase molecular simulations.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2017Article
- Ambient-Potential Composite Ewald Method for ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2016Article
- Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Charge-dependent many-body exchange and dispersion interactions in combined QM/MM simulations.The Journal of chemical physics · 2015Article
- Nucleic acid reactivity: challenges for next-generation semiempirical quantum models.Journal of computational chemistry · 2015Article
- Multipolar Ewald methods, 1: theory, accuracy, and performance.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015Article
- Multipolar Ewald methods, 2: applications using a quantum mechanical force field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015Article
- Multiscale methods for computational RNA enzymology.Methods in enzymology · 2015Article
- Explicit polarization: a quantum mechanical framework for developing next generation force fields.Accounts of chemical research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conspectus There is need in the molecular simulation community to develop new quantum mechanical (QM) methods that can be routinely applied to the simulation of large molecular systems in complex, heterogeneous condensed phase environments. Although conventional methods, such as the hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) method, are adequate for many problems, there remain other applications that demand a fully quantum mechanical approach. QM methods are generally required in applications that involve changes in electronic structure, such as when chemical bond formation or cleavage occurs, when molecules respond to one another through polarization or charge transfer, or when matter interacts with electromagnetic fields. A full QM treatment, rather than QM/MM, is necessary when these features present themselves over a wide spatial range that, in some cases, may span the entire system. Specific examples include the study of catalytic events that involve delocalized changes in chemical bonds, charge transfer, or extensive polarization of the macromolecular environment; drug discovery applications, where the wide range of nonstandard residues and protonation states are challenging to model with purely empirical MM force fields; and the interpretation of spectroscopic observables. Unfortunately, the enormous computational cost of conventional QM methods limit their practical application to small systems. Linear-scaling electronic structure methods (LSQMs) make possible the calculation of large systems but are still too computationally intensive to be applied with the degree of configurational sampling often required to make meaningful comparison with experiment. In this work, we present advances in the development of a quantum mechanical force field (QMFF) suitable for application to biological macromolecules and condensed phase simulations. QMFFs leverage the benefits provided by the LSQM and QM/MM approaches to produce a fully QM method that is able to simultaneously achieve very high accuracy and efficiency. The efficiency of the QMFF is made possible by partitioning the system into fragments and self-consistently solving for the fragment-localized molecular orbitals in the presence of the other fragment's electron densities. Unlike a LSQM, the QMFF introduces empirical parameters that are tuned to obtain very accurate intermolecular forces. The speed and accuracy of our QMFF is demonstrated through a series of examples ranging from small molecule clusters to condensed phase simulation, and applications to drug docking and protein-protein interactions. In these examples, comparisons are made to conventional molecular mechanical models, semiempirical methods, ab initio Hamiltonians, and a hybrid QM/MM method. The comparisons demonstrate the superior accuracy of our QMFF relative to the other models; nonetheless, we stress that the overarching role of QMFFs is not to supplant these established computational methods for problems where their use is appropriate. The role of QMFFs within the toolbox of multiscale modeling methods is to extend the range of applications to include problems that demand a fully quantum mechanical treatment of a large system with extensive configurational sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.