Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24937093›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2014

Deformable image registration with local rigidity constraints for cone-beam CT-guided spine surgery.

S Reaungamornrat, A S Wang, A Uneri, Y Otake, A J Khanna, J H Siewerdsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MAIRNet: weakly supervised anatomy-aware multimodal articulated image registration network.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. A level-wise spine registration framework to account for large pose changes.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MIND Demons for MR-to-CT Deformable Image Registration In Image-Guided Spine Surgery.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S ReaungamornratDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
A S Wang
A Uneri
Y Otake
A J Khanna
J H Siewerdsen
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
High-Performance Cone-Beam CT Guidance of Head and Neck SurgeryR01CA127444 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2007 to 2010
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127444NCI NIH HHS R01-CA-127444NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guided spine surgery (IGSS) is associated with reduced co-morbidity and improved surgical outcome. However, precise localization of target anatomy and adjacent nerves and vessels relative to planning information (e.g., device trajectories) can be challenged by anatomical deformation. Rigid registration alone fails to account for deformation associated with changes in spine curvature, and conventional deformable registration fails to account for rigidity of the vertebrae, causing unrealistic distortions in the registered image that can confound high-precision surgery. We developed and evaluated a deformable registration method capable of preserving rigidity of bones while resolving the deformation of surrounding soft tissue. The method aligns preoperative CT to intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) using free-form deformation (FFD) with constraints on rigid body motion imposed according to a simple intensity threshold of bone intensities. The constraints enforced three properties of a rigid transformation-namely, constraints on affinity (AC), orthogonality (OC), and properness (PC). The method also incorporated an injectivity constraint (IC) to preserve topology. Physical experiments involving phantoms, an ovine spine, and a human cadaver as well as digital simulations were performed to evaluate the sensitivity to registration parameters, preservation of rigid body morphology, and overall registration accuracy of constrained FFD in comparison to conventional unconstrained FFD (uFFD) and Demons registration. FFD with orthogonality and injectivity constraints (denoted FFD+OC+IC) demonstrated improved performance compared to uFFD and Demons. Affinity and properness constraints offered little or no additional improvement. The FFD+OC+IC method preserved rigid body morphology at near-ideal values of zero dilatation (D = 0.05, compared to 0.39 and 0.56 for uFFD and Demons, respectively) and shear (S = 0.08, compared to 0.36 and 0.44 for uFFD and Demons, respectively). Target registration error (TRE) was similarly improved for FFD+OC+IC (0.7 mm), compared to 1.4 and 1.8 mm for uFFD and Demons. Results were validated in human cadaver studies using CT and CBCT images, with FFD+OC+IC providing excellent preservation of rigid morphology and equivalent or improved TRE. The approach therefore overcomes distortions intrinsic to uFFD and could better facilitate high-precision IGSS.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansMovementSpineSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID24937093
PMCPMC4118832
OpenAlexW2039010240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.