Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24937016›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2014

Tailored weight loss intervention in obese adults within primary care practice: rationale, design, and methods of Choose to Lose.

Sheri J Hartman, Patricia M Risica, Kim M Gans, Bess H Marcus, Charles B Eaton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheri J HartmanProgram in Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: sjhartman@ucsd.edu.
Patricia M RisicaInstitute for Community Health Promotion, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kim M GansInstitute for Community Health Promotion, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Bess H MarcusProgram in Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Charles B EatonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Primary Care and Prevention, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, USA; Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Tailored Lifestyle Intervention in Obese Adults within Primary Care PracticeR18DK079880 · NIDDK · MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND · PI EATON, CHARLES B · 2009 to 2013
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS 5R18DK079880NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK079880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are efficacious weight loss interventions that can improve health and delay onset of diabetes and hypertension, these interventions have not been translated into clinical practice. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a tailored lifestyle intervention in primary care patients. Patients were recruited by their primary care physicians and eligible participants were randomized to an enhanced intervention or standard intervention. All participants met with a lifestyle counselor to set calorie and physical activity goals and to discuss behavioral strategies at baseline, 6 and 12 months. During the first year, enhanced intervention participants receive monthly counseling phone calls to assist in attaining and maintaining their goals. Enhanced intervention participants also receive weekly mailings consisting of tailored and non-tailored print materials and videos focusing on weight loss, physical activity promotion and healthy eating. The second year focuses on maintenance with enhanced intervention participants receiving tailored and non-tailored print materials and videos regularly throughout the year. Standard intervention participants receive five informational handouts on weight loss across the two years. This enhanced intervention that consists of multiple modalities of print, telephone, and video with limited face-to-face counseling holds promise for being effective for encouraging weight loss, increasing physical activity and healthy eating, and also for being cost effective and generalizable for wide clinical use. This study will fill an important gap in our knowledge regarding the translation and dissemination of research from efficacy studies to best practices in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorResearch DesignAdolescentAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCounselingDietExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMotivationObesityPhysical activityPrimary careTailored interventionWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID24937016
PMCPMC4151311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.