Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

OccuPeak: ChIP-Seq peak calling based on internal background modelling.

Bouke A de Boer, Karel van Duijvenboden, Malou van den Boogaard, Vincent M Christoffels, Phil Barnett, Jan M Ruijter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome-wide analysis of primary microRNA expression using H3K36me3 ChIP-seq data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatiotemporal regulation of enhancers during cardiogenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bouke A de BoerDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karel van DuijvenbodenDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Malou van den BoogaardDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent M ChristoffelsDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Phil BarnettDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan M RuijterDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology & Physiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledChIP-seq has become a major tool for the genome-wide identification of transcription factor binding or histone modification sites. Most peak-calling algorithms require input control datasets to model the occurrence of background reads to account for local sequencing and GC bias. However, the GC-content of reads in Input-seq datasets deviates significantly from that in ChIP-seq datasets. Moreover, we observed that a commonly used peak calling program performed equally well when the use of a simulated uniform background set was compared to an Input-seq dataset. This contradicts the assumption that input control datasets are necessary to fatefully reflect the background read distribution. Because the GC-content of the abundant single reads in ChIP-seq datasets is similar to those of randomly sampled regions we designed a peak-calling algorithm with a background model based on overlapping single reads. The application, OccuPeak, uses the abundant low frequency tags present in each ChIP-seq dataset to model the background, thereby avoiding the need for additional datasets. Analysis of the performance of OccuPeak showed robust model parameters. Its measure of peak significance, the excess ratio, is only dependent on the tag density of a peak and the global noise levels. Compared to the commonly used peak-calling applications MACS and CisGenome, OccuPeak had the highest sensitivity in an enhancer identification benchmark test, and performed similar in an overlap tests of transcription factor occupation with DNase I hypersensitive sites and H3K27ac sites. Moreover, peaks called by OccuPeak were significantly enriched with cardiac disease-associated SNPs. OccuPeak runs as a standalone application and does not require extensive tweaking of parameters, making its use straightforward and user friendly. AVAILABILITY: http://occupeak.hfrc.nl.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAnimalsBase CompositionBase SequenceChromatin ImmunoprecipitationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24936875
PMCPMC4061025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.