Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936414›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2014

Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning.

Paul Bentley, Jeban Ganesalingam, Anoma Lalani Carlton Jones, Kate Mahady, Sarah Epton, Paul Rinne, Pankaj Sharma, Omid Halse, Amrish Mehta, Daniel Rueckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automated estimation of ischemic core volume on noncontrast-enhanced CT via machine learning.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul BentleyDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Jeban GanesalingamDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Anoma Lalani Carlton JonesDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Kate MahadyDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Sarah EptonDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Paul RinneDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Pankaj SharmaDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Omid HalseDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Amrish MehtaDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.
Daniel RueckertDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Rd., London W6 8RF, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical decision-step in the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke is whether or not to administer thrombolysis - a treatment that can result in good recovery, or deterioration due to symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH). Certain imaging features based upon early computerized tomography (CT), in combination with clinical variables, have been found to predict SICH, albeit with modest accuracy. In this proof-of-concept study, we determine whether machine learning of CT images can predict which patients receiving tPA will develop SICH as opposed to showing clinical improvement with no haemorrhage. Clinical records and CT brains of 116 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis were collected retrospectively (including 16 who developed SICH). The sample was split into training (n = 106) and test sets (n = 10), repeatedly for 1760 different combinations. CT brain images acted as inputs into a support vector machine (SVM), along with clinical severity. Performance of the SVM was compared with established prognostication tools (SEDAN and HAT scores; original, or after adaptation to our cohort). Predictive performance, assessed as area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), of the SVM (0.744) compared favourably with that of prognostic scores (original and adapted versions: 0.626-0.720; p < 0.01). The SVM also identified 9 out of 16 SICHs, as opposed to 1-5 using prognostic scores, assuming a 10% SICH frequency (p < 0.001). In summary, machine learning methods applied to acute stroke CT images offer automation, and potentially improved performance, for prediction of SICH following thrombolysis. Larger-scale cohorts, and incorporation of advanced imaging, should be tested with such methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOutcome Assessment, Health CareTomography, X-Ray ComputedArea Under CurveBrainFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen ActivatorImagingMachine learningPredictionStrokeThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID24936414
PMCPMC4053635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.