Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936413›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2014

Striatal disorders dissociate mechanisms of enhanced and impaired response selection - Evidence from cognitive neurophysiology and computational modelling.

Christian Beste, Mark Humphries, Carsten Saft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian BesteCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
Mark HumphriesFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Carsten SaftDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
St. Josef-Hospital · DETU Dresden · DEUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J008648/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paradoxically enhanced cognitive processes in neurological disorders provide vital clues to understanding neural function. However, what determines whether the neurological damage is impairing or enhancing is unclear. Here we use the performance of patients with two disorders of the striatum to dissociate mechanisms underlying cognitive enhancement and impairment resulting from damage to the same system. In a two-choice decision task, Huntington's disease patients were faster and less error prone than controls, yet a patient with the rare condition of benign hereditary chorea (BHC) was both slower and more error prone. EEG recordings confirmed significant differences in neural processing between the groups. Analysis of a computational model revealed that the common loss of connectivity between striatal neurons in BHC and Huntington's disease impairs response selection, but the increased sensitivity of NMDA receptors in Huntington's disease potentially enhances response selection. Crucially the model shows that there is a critical threshold for increased sensitivity: below that threshold, impaired response selection results. Our data and model thus predict that specific striatal malfunctions can contribute to either impaired or enhanced selection, and provide clues to solving the paradox of how Huntington's disease can lead to both impaired and enhanced cognitive processes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceCognition DisordersContingent Negative VariationCorpus StriatumDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsN-MethylaspartateAMPA, a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acidBasal gangliaBenign hereditary choreaBHC, benign hereditary choreaComputational modellingEEGEEG, electroencephalographyERP, event related potentialExecutive controlFSIs, fast spiking interneuronsGABA, ?-aminobutyric acidHuntington's diseaseMMN, mismatch negativityMMSE, Mini Mental Status ExaminationMSN, medium spiny neuronNMDA, N-methyl-d-aspartateRON, reorientation of attention

Identifiers

PMID24936413
PMCPMC4053645
OpenAlexW2091526846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.