Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936407›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2014

A template-based procedure for determining white matter integrity in the internal capsule early after stroke.

Matthew A Petoe, Winston D Byblow, Esther J M de Vries, Venkatesh Krishnamurthy, Cathy S Zhong, P Alan Barber, Cathy M Stinear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew A PetoeDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Winston D ByblowCentre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Department of Sport & Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Esther J M de VriesDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Venkatesh KrishnamurthyNeurology Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cathy S ZhongDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
P Alan BarberDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Neurology Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cathy M StinearDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrity of descending white matter pathways, measured by fractional anisotropy from DW-MRI, is a key prognostic indicator of motor recovery after stroke. Barriers to translation of fractional anisotropy measures into routine clinical practice include the time required for manually delineating volumes of interest (VOIs), and inter-examiner variability in this process. This study investigated whether registering and then editing template volumes of interest 'as required' would improve inter-examiner reliability compared with manual delineation, without compromising validity. MRI was performed with 30 sub-acute stroke patients with motor deficits (mean NIHSS = 11, range 0-17). Four independent examiners manually delineated VOIs for the posterior limbs of the internal capsules on T1 images, or edited template VOIs that had been registered to the T1 images if they encroached on ventricles or basal ganglia. Fractional anisotropy within each VOI and interhemispheric asymmetry were then calculated. We found that 13/30 registered template VOIs required editing. Edited template VOIs were more spatially similar between examiners than the manually delineated VOIs (p = 0.005). Both methods produced similar asymmetry values that correlated with clinical scores with near perfect levels of agreement between examiners. Contralesional fractional anisotropy correlated with age when edited template VOIs were used but not when VOIs were manually delineated. Editing template VOIs as required is reliable, increases the validity of fractional anisotropy measurements in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, and is less time-consuming compared to manual delineation. This approach could support the use of FA asymmetry measures in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceAnisotropyDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInternal CapsuleLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStrokeDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingPrognosisStroke

Identifiers

PMID24936407
PMCPMC4053651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.