ArticleBioscience of microbiota, food and health2013
Comparison of the accuracy and mechanism of data mining identification of the intestinal microbiota with 7 restriction enzymes.
Article in Bioscience of microbiota, food and health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerical analyses of intestinal microbiota by data mining.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2018Review
- Article
- Applying Data Mining to Classify Age by Intestinal Microbiota in 92 Healthy Men Using a Combination of Several Restriction Enzymes for T-RFLP Experiments.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2014Article
- Technical Aspects of Nominal Partitions on Accuracy of Data Mining Classification of Intestinal Microbiota - Comparison between 7 Restriction Enzymes.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota compositions of 92 Japanese men were identified following consumption of identical meals for 3 days, and collected feces were analyzed through terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. The obtained operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and subjects' smoking and drinking habits, which had 2 nominal partitions, yes or no, were analyzed by Data mining software. Identification of subjects for each habit was successfully performed and reported previously, but the identification accuracy was closely dependent on the species of the applied restriction enzymes for PCR. For the sake of better selection of enzymes and understanding the mechanisms of Data mining analysis, 516f-BslI and 516f-HaeIII, 27f-MspI and 27f-AluI and 35f-HhaI, 35f-MspI and 35f-AluI, altogether 7 enzymes, were examined comparatively. Data mining analysis provides a Decision tree for identification of subjects and their dividing pathways that is produced using a limited number of OTUs, which affects the accuracy of the results. The present report discusses not only a global comparison of accuracies for characteristics, but also the detailed mechanisms that result in better or worse results and the practical roles and functions of OTUs. The OTU at the 1st step of the constructed Decision tree was the most important for any identification, and for all cases, the combination of subsequent OTUs, which formed later in the Decision tree, was also unignorable. Detailed dividing pathways were traced and compared for the 7 enzymes and the future supporting ideas were provided for better Data mining analysis of the human intestinal microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.