Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936306›Full record

ReviewInterventional medicine & applied science2014

Radiation sterilization of new drug delivery systems.

Gürhan Abuhanoğlu, A Yekta Ozer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional medicine & applied science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Challenges in delivering therapeutic peptides and proteins: A silk-based solution.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Astropharmacy: Roles of Pharmacist in Space.Innovations in pharmacy · 2022
    Review
  10. Protection against virulentClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gürhan AbuhanoğluDepartment of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University Sıhhiye, Ankara Turkey.
A Yekta OzerDepartment of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University Sıhhiye, Ankara Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation sterilization has now become a commonly used method for sterilization of several active ingredients in drugs or drug delivery systems containing these substances. In this context, many applications have been performed on the human products that are required to be sterile, as well as on pharmaceutical products prepared to be developed. The new drug delivery systems designed to deliver the medication to the target tissue or organ, such as microspheres, nanospheres, microemulsion, and liposomal systems, have been sterilized by gamma (γ) and beta (β) rays, and more recently, by e-beam sterilization. In this review, the sterilization of new drug delivery systems was discussed other than conventional drug delivery systems by γ irradiation.

Indexed as

e-beam sterilizationneutron radiation (e-beam) sterilizationnew drug delivery systemsradiation sterilizationsterilization by gamma radiation

Identifiers

PMID24936306
PMCPMC4047505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.