ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2014
Impact of chronic disease self-management programs on type 2 diabetes management in primary care.
Article in World journal of diabetes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC public health · 2015Pooled it
- Participation of lower-to-middle wage workers in a study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) effectiveness: Implications for reducing chronic disease burden among racial and ethnic minority populations.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2019Trial
- Effects of the Stanford Chronic Conditions Model on Behavioral and Clinical Indicators in Saudi Arabia: A Prospective Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Effects of patient education on the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022Article
- Self-management Education Program: The Case of Glycemic Control of Type 2 Diabetes.Oman medical journal · 2021Review
- Self-management of persons living with diabetes mellitus type 2: Experiences of diabetes nurse educators.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2020Article
- An iron triangle ROI model for health care.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2019Article
- Self-Care and Self-Management Among Adolescent T2DM Patients: A Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Review
- Barriers to Self-management of Serious Mental Illness and Diabetes.American journal of health behavior · 2016Article
- Outside the exam room: policies for connecting clinic to community in diabetes prevention and treatment.Preventing chronic disease · 2015Review
- Psychological aspects of diabetes care: Effecting behavioral change in patients.World journal of diabetes · 2014Review
- Iranian patients require more pertinent care to prevent type 2 diabetes complications.Advances in preventive medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo assess the effectiveness of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) on glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and selected self-reported measures.
methodsWe compared patients who received a diabetes self-care behavioral intervention, the CDSMP developed at the Stanford University, with controls who received usual care on their HbA1c and selected self-reported measures, including diabetes self-care activities, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), pain and fatigue. The subjects were a subset of participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial that took place at seven regional clinics of a university-affiliated integrated healthcare system of a multi-specialty group practice between January 2009 and June 2011. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from randomization to 12 mo. Data were analyzed using multilevel statistical models and linear mixed models to provide unbiased estimates of intervention effects.
resultsDemographic and baseline clinical characteristics were generally comparable between the two groups. The average baseline HbA1c values in the CDSMP and control groups were 9.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Significant reductions in HbA1c were seen at 12 mo for the two groups, with adjusted changes around 0.6% (P < 0.0001), but the reductions did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.885). Few significant differences were observed in participants' diabetes self-care activities. No significant differences were observed in the participants' HRQOL, pain, or fatigue measures.
conclusionThe CDSMP intervention may not lower HbA1c any better than good routine care in an integrated healthcare system. More research is needed to understand the benefits of self-management programs in primary care in different settings and populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.