Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936202›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Building the crops of tomorrow: advantages of symbiont-based approaches to improving abiotic stress tolerance.

Devin Coleman-Derr, Susannah G Tringe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Seeds ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Soil mycobiome in sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rhizosphere plant-microbe interactions under water stress.Advances in applied microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Symbiosis and the Anthropocene.Symbiosis (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Deciphering the Root Endosphere Microbiome of the Desert PlantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Devin Coleman-DerrJoint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.
Susannah G TringeJoint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential growth in world population is feeding a steadily increasing global need for arable farmland, a resource that is already in high demand. This trend has led to increased farming on subprime arid and semi-arid lands, where limited availability of water and a host of environmental stresses often severely reduce crop productivity. The conventional approach to mitigating the abiotic stresses associated with arid climes is to breed for stress-tolerant cultivars, a time and labor intensive venture that often neglects the complex ecological context of the soil environment in which the crop is grown. In recent years, studies have attempted to identify microbial symbionts capable of conferring the same stress-tolerance to their plant hosts, and new developments in genomic technologies have greatly facilitated such research. Here, we highlight many of the advantages of these symbiont-based approaches and argue in favor of the broader recognition of crop species as ecological niches for a diverse community of microorganisms that function in concert with their plant hosts and each other to thrive under fluctuating environmental conditions.

Indexed as

abiotic stressagriculturedroughtplant growth promotionplant–microbe interactionssymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID24936202
PMCPMC4047557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.