Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936194›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

Increasing interpersonal trust through divergent thinking.

Roberta Sellaro, Bernhard Hommel, Erik W de Kwaadsteniet, Suzanne van de Groep, Lorenza S Colzato

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Creative thinking does not promote dishonesty.Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Meditation and Metacontrol.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2017
    Article
  8. Editorial: Trust: The Limits of Human Moral.Frontiers in psychology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Interpersonal trust: an event-based account.Frontiers in psychology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta SellaroInstitute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Bernhard HommelInstitute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Erik W de KwaadstenietInstitute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Suzanne van de GroepInstitute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Lorenza S ColzatoInstitute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpersonal trust is an essential ingredient of many social relationships but how stable is it actually, and how is it controlled? There is evidence that the degree of trust into others might be rather volatile and can be affected by manipulations like drawing attention to personal interdependence or independence. Here we investigated whether the degree of interpersonal trust can be biased by inducing either a more integrative or a more focused/exclusive cognitive control mode by means of a creativity task requiring divergent or convergent thinking, respectively. Participants then performed the trust game, which provides an index of interpersonal trust by assessing the money units one participant (the trustor) transfers to another (the trustee). As expected, trustors transferred significantly more money to trustees after engaging in divergent thinking as compared to convergent thinking. This observation provides support for the idea that interpersonal trust is controlled by domain-general (i.e., not socially dedicated) cognitive states.

Indexed as

control-stateconvergent thinkingdivergent thinkinginterpersonal trust

Identifiers

PMID24936194
PMCPMC4047710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.