Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936088›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Emerging perspectives from the hearing voices movement: implications for research and practice.

Dirk Corstens, Eleanor Longden, Simon McCarthy-Jones, Rachel Waddingham, Neil Thomas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05044715 (Effectiveness of Compassion Focused Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05044715 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) Adapted to a Group Format: Outcomes and Mechanisms of Change

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham Young UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled14ConditionsCompassion, Self-Criticism, Shame, GuiltArmsTreatment as Usual, Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dirk CorstensRIAGG Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; d.corstens@riagg-maastricht.nl.
Eleanor LongdenInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK;
Simon McCarthy-JonesARC Centre for Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK;
Rachel WaddinghamLondon Hearing Voices Project, Mind in Camden, London, UK;
Neil ThomasBrain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Durham University · GBLondon Borough of Camden · GBMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The international Hearing Voices Movement (HVM) is a prominent mental health service-user/survivor movement that promotes the needs and perspectives of experts by experience in the phenomenon of hearing voices (auditory verbal hallucinations). The main tenet of the HVM is the notion that hearing voices is a meaningful human experience, and in this article, we discuss the historical growth and influence of the HVM before considering the implications of its values for research and practice in relation to voice-hearing. Among other recommendations, we suggest that the involvement of voice-hearers in research and a greater use of narrative and qualitative approaches are essential. Challenges for implementing user-led research are identified, and avenues for future developments are discussed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHallucinationsPatient AdvocacySchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyHumansPatient ParticipationPeer GroupResearchSelf-Help Groupsauditory hallucinationsservice-user involvementsocial psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID24936088
PMCPMC4141309
OpenAlexW2126483083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.