Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936087›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Better than mermaids and stray dogs? Subtyping auditory verbal hallucinations and its implications for research and practice.

Simon McCarthy-Jones, Neil Thomas, Clara Strauss, Guy Dodgson, Nev Jones, Angela Woods, Chris R Brewin, Mark Hayward, Massoud Stephane, Jack Barton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hallucinations on demand: the utility of experimentally induced phenomena in hallucination research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon McCarthy-JonesDepartment of Cognitive Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK; s.mccarthyjones@gmail.com.
Neil ThomasBrain and Psychological Sciences Centre, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia;
Clara StraussSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK; Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK;
Guy DodgsonEarly Intervention in Psychosis, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS FT, Newcastle, UK;
Nev JonesDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL;
Angela WoodsCentre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK;
Chris R BrewinDivision of Psychology & Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK;
Mark HaywardSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK; Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK;
Massoud StephaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR;
Jack BartonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK;
David KingdonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;
Iris E SommerDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 086049Wellcome Trust 098455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenological diversity of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) is not currently accounted for by any model based around a single mechanism. This has led to the proposal that there may be distinct AVH subtypes, which each possess unique (as well as shared) underpinning mechanisms. This could have important implications both for research design and clinical interventions because different subtypes may be responsive to different types of treatment. This article explores how AVH subtypes may be identified at the levels of phenomenology, cognition, neurology, etiology, treatment response, diagnosis, and voice hearer's own interpretations. Five subtypes are proposed; hypervigilance, autobiographical memory (subdivided into dissociative and nondissociative), inner speech (subdivided into obsessional, own thought, and novel), epileptic and deafferentation. We suggest other facets of AVH, including negative content and form (eg, commands), may be best treated as dimensional constructs that vary across subtypes. After considering the limitations and challenges of AVH subtyping, we highlight future research directions, including the need for a subtype assessment tool.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyHallucinationsHumansResearchAVHhearing voicesphenomenologyschizophreniasymptom classificationtrauma

Identifiers

PMID24936087
PMCPMC4141311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.