Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24935615›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

Molecular revolution in the diagnosis of microbial brain abscesses.

A K Mishra, H Dufour, P-H Roche, M Lonjon, D Raoult, P-E Fournier

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SpontaneousClinical case reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Laboratory Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infection.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

A K MishraURMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 05, France.
H Dufour
P-H Roche
M Lonjon
D Raoult
P-E Fournier
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Nord · FRInserm · FRUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A brain abscess is a life-threatening infection, frequently with serious sequelae. Culture-based methods present many limitations and do not enable an exhaustive documentation of the bacterial flora. 16S rRNA-based amplification, cloning, and high-throughput sequencing have dramatically increased the number of identified agents of brain abscesses, showing that the causative flora is polymicrobial in up to 40 % of cases, with the presence of at least one anaerobic bacterium. In contrast, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology is an appealing alternative to culture-based methods for diagnosing brain abscesses due to its speed, sensitivity, and specificity. Molecular typing is available for several bacterial and fungal genera, and this user-friendly tool is accessible for the clinical microbiology laboratory to diagnose microbes involved in a brain abscess. This article reviews the applications of the currently available tools for the etiological diagnosis of a brain abscess.

Indexed as

Brain AbscessDNA, BacterialHumansMolecular TypingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24935615
OpenAlexW2029823958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.