ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2014
Molecular biomarkers in interstitial lung diseases.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Progranulin Level Might Differentiate Non-IPF ILD from IPF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Extracellular Vesicles in Interstitial Lung Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Elevated serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 in systemic sclerosis: a marker of lung fibrosis and severity of the disease.Rheumatology international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are protean conditions with substantial overlap in terms of diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and management. However, the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is different from that of more immunologically driven ILD patterns, such as ILD associated with connective tissue diseases. It is important to provide accurate diagnosis and patient selection for prognostication and timely treatment, preferably at baseline. Validated non-invasive biomarkers fulfilling these unmet clinical needs are warranted. Although no ILD biomarker has been adopted in clinical practice so far, advancements in this field have been achieved, especially with the implementation of high-throughput techniques and clinical-laboratory multi-parametric panels. This review focuses on selected validated and/or potentially interesting biomarkers investigated in the peripheral blood and lung tissue of patients with ILD. Current issues and future directions in various aspects of ILD biomarkers research and its clinical application are explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.