Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24935348›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2014

Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial.

Ron K Tam, Hubert Wong, Amy Plint, Nathalie Lepage, Guido Filler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00462527 (Cystatin C as a Marker for Detecting Early Renal Dysfunction in a Pediatric Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00462527 completednot on this map

Cystatin C as a Marker for Detecting Early Renal Dysfunction in a Pediatric Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioRan2007 to 2008Enrolled464ConditionsAcute Renal Failure, Gastroenteritis, Dehydration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Pediatric Dehydration Assessment at Triage: Prospective Study on Refilling Time.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ron K Tam
Hubert Wong
Amy Plint
Nathalie Lepage
Guido FillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Western University, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada. guido.filler@lhsc.on.ca.
University of Ottawa · CACredit Valley Hospital · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1-8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group remain elusive. We hypothesized that the CDS correlates with a wide spectrum of established markers of dehydration, making it an appropriate and easy-to-use clinical tool.

methodsThis study was designed as a prospective double-cohort trial in a single tertiary care center. Children with diarrhea and vomiting, who clinically required intravenous fluids for rehydration, were compared with minor trauma patients who required intravenous needling for conscious sedation. We compared the CDS with clinical and urinary markers (urinary electrolytes, proteins, ratios and fractional excretions) for dehydration in both groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsWe enrolled 73 children (male = 36) in the dehydration group and 143 (male = 105) in the comparison group. Median age was 32 months (range 3-214) in the dehydration and 96 months (range 2.6-214 months, p < 0.0001) in the trauma group. Median CDS was 3 (range 0-8) within the dehydration group and 0 in the comparison group (p < 0.0001). The following parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the comparison group and the dehydrated group: difference in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, urine sodium/potassium ratio, urine sodium, fractional sodium excretion, serum bicarbonate, and creatinine measurements. The best markers for dehydration were urine Na and serum bicarbonate (ROC AUC = 0.798 and 0.821, respectively). CDS was most closely correlated with serum bicarbonate (Pearson r = -0.3696, p = 0.002).

conclusionAlthough serum bicarbonate is not the gold standard for dehydration, this study provides further evidence for the usefulness of the CDS as a dehydration marker in children.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00462527) on April 18, 2007.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdolescentBicarbonatesBiomarkersBlood PressureChildChild, PreschoolCreatinineDehydrationFemaleFluid TherapyGastroenteritisHeart RateHumansInfantMaleBicarbonatesBiomarkersCreatininePotassiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID24935348
PMCPMC4081489
OpenAlexW2006334133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.