Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24935251›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2014

From transient transcriptome responses to disturbed neurodevelopment: role of histone acetylation and methylation as epigenetic switch between reversible and irreversible drug effects.

Nina V Balmer, Stefanie Klima, Eugen Rempel, Violeta N Ivanova, Raivo Kolde, Matthias K Weng, Kesavan Meganathan, Margit Henry, Agapios Sachinidis, Michael R Berthold and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Testing of female reproductive disorders.Archives of toxicology · 2020
    Article
  14. Reproductive toxicity of boron.EXCLI journal · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina V BalmerDoerenkamp-Zbinden Chair for In Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, University of Konstanz, Box 657, 78457, Constance, Germany.
Stefanie Klima
Eugen Rempel
Violeta N Ivanova
Raivo Kolde
Matthias K Weng
Kesavan Meganathan
Margit Henry
Agapios Sachinidis
Michael R Berthold
Jan G Hengstler
Jörg Rahnenführer
Tanja Waldmann
Marcel Leist
University of Konstanz · DETU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEQuretec (Estonia) · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superordinate principles governing the transcriptome response of differentiating cells exposed to drugs are still unclear. Often, it is assumed that toxicogenomics data reflect the immediate mode of action (MoA) of drugs. Alternatively, transcriptome changes could describe altered differentiation states as indirect consequence of drug exposure. We used here the developmental toxicants valproate and trichostatin A to address this question. Neurally differentiating human embryonic stem cells were treated for 6 days. Histone acetylation (primary MoA) increased quickly and returned to baseline after 48 h. Histone H3 lysine methylation at the promoter of the neurodevelopmental regulators PAX6 or OTX2 was increasingly altered over time. Methylation changes remained persistent and correlated with neurodevelopmental defects and with effects on PAX6 gene expression, also when the drug was washed out after 3-4 days. We hypothesized that drug exposures altering only acetylation would lead to reversible transcriptome changes (indicating MoA), and challenges that altered methylation would lead to irreversible developmental disturbances. Data from pulse-chase experiments corroborated this assumption. Short drug treatment triggered reversible transcriptome changes; longer exposure disrupted neurodevelopment. The disturbed differentiation was reflected by an altered transcriptome pattern, and the observed changes were similar when the drug was washed out during the last 48 h. We conclude that transcriptome data after prolonged chemical stress of differentiating cells mainly reflect the altered developmental stage of the model system and not the drug MoA. We suggest that brief exposures, followed by immediate analysis, are more suitable for information on immediate drug responses and the toxicity MoA.

Indexed as

AcetylationCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenesis, GeneticEye ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesHomeodomain ProteinsHumansHydroxamic AcidsMethylationPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsTime FactorsEye ProteinsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesHomeodomain ProteinsHydroxamic AcidsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 protein, humanPAX6 Transcription FactorRepressor Proteinstrichostatin AValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24935251
PMCPMC4067541
OpenAlexW1972901606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.