Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24935249›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

Endothelial cell response to chemical, biological, and physical cues in bioactive hydrogels.

Mary Beth Browning, Viviana Guiza, Brooke Russell, Jose Rivera, Stacy Cereceres, Magnus Höök, Mariah S Hahn, Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prokaryotic Collagen-Like Proteins as Novel Biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Beth Browning1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas.
Viviana Guiza
Brooke Russell
Jose Rivera
Stacy Cereceres
Magnus Höök
Mariah S Hahn
Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez
Texas A&M University · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

BINDING OF BACTERIA TO FIBRONECTIN AN FIBRINOGENR01AI020624 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HOOK, AXEL MAGNUS · 1985 to 2020
$9.7M
MULTILAYER VASCULAR GRAFTS BASED ON COLLAGEN-MIMETIC HYDROGELSR01EB013297 · NIBIB · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI HAHN, MARIAH S, MAITLAND, DUNCAN J · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI020624NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB013297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly tunable biological, chemical, and physical properties of bioactive hydrogels enable their use in an array of tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Systematic modulation of these properties can be used to elucidate key cell-material interactions to improve therapeutic effects. For example, the rate and extent of endothelialization are critical to the long-term success of many blood-contacting devices. To this end, we have developed a bioactive hydrogel that could be used as coating on cardiovascular devices to enhance endothelial cell (EC) adhesion and migration. The current work investigates the relative impact of hydrogel variables on key endothelialization processes. The bioactive hydrogel is based on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and a streptococcal collagen-like (Scl2-2) protein that has been modified with integrin α1β1 and α2β1 binding sites. The use of PEG hydrogels allows for incorporation of specific bioactive cues and independent manipulation of scaffold properties. The selective integrin binding of Scl2-2 was compared to more traditional collagen-modified PEG hydrogels to determine the effect of integrin binding on cell behavior. Protein functionalization density, protein concentration, and substrate modulus were independently tuned with both Scl2-2 and collagen to determine the effect of each variable on EC adhesion, spreading, and migration. The findings here demonstrate that increasing substrate modulus, decreasing functionalization density, and increasing protein concentration can be utilized to increase EC adhesion and migration. Additionally, PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels had higher migration speeds and proliferation over 1 week compared with PEG-collagen gels, demonstrating that selective integrin binding can be used to enhance cell-material interactions. Overall, these studies contribute to the understanding of the effects of matrix cues on EC interactions and demonstrate the strong potential of PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels to promote endothelialization of blood-contacting devices.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCell AdhesionCell LineCell MovementEndothelial CellsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePolyethylene GlycolsTissue EngineeringHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID24935249
PMCPMC4259175
OpenAlexW171904674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.