Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24935217›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2015

Abnormal aortic arch morphology in Turner syndrome patients is a risk factor for hypertension.

Katya De Groote, Daniël Devos, Koen Van Herck, Laurent Demulier, Wesley Buysse, Jean De Schepper, Daniël De Wolf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Aortic growth rates in a Swedish cohort of women with Turner syndrome.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Turner syndrome: mechanisms and management.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  8. Cardiometabolic health in Turner syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2019
    Review
  9. Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
  10. Proximal aortic stiffening in Turner patients may be present before dilation can be detected: a segmental functional MRI study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katya De GrooteDivision of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 3K12D, Administratie pediatrie, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. katya.degroote@uzgent.be.
Daniël DevosCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen Van HerckDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Laurent DemulierDepartment of Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Wesley BuysseDepartment of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean De SchepperDivision of Paediatric Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Daniël De WolfDivision of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 3K12D, Administratie pediatrie, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension in Turner syndrome (TS) is a multifactorial, highly prevalent and significant problem that warrants timely diagnosis and rigorous treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between abnormal aortic arch morphology and hypertension in adult TS patients. This was a single centre retrospective study in 74 adult TS patients (age 29.41 ± 8.91 years) who underwent a routine cardiac MRI. Patients were assigned to the hypertensive group (N = 31) if blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and/or if they were treated with antihypertensive medication. Aortic arch morphology was evaluated on MRI images and initially assigned as normal (N = 54) or abnormal (N = 20), based on the curve of the transverse arch and the distance between the left common carotid-left subclavian artery. We additionally used a new more objective method to describe aortic arch abnormality in TS by determination of the relative position of the highest point of the transverse arch (AoHP). Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension is significantly and independently associated with age, BMI and abnormal arch morphology, with a larger effect size for the new AoHP method than for the classical method. TS patients with hypertension and abnormal arch morphology more often had dilatation of the ascending aorta. There is a significant association between abnormal arch morphology and hypertension in TS patients, independent of age and BMI, and not related to other structural heart disease. We suggest that aortic arch morphology should be included in the risk stratification for hypertension in TS and propose a new quantitative method to express aortic arch morphology.

Indexed as

AdultAorta, ThoracicBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertensionMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTurner SyndromeVascular MalformationsAortic archAscending aortaHypertensionRisk stratificationTurner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID24935217
OpenAlexW2170804248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.