ArticleFertility and sterility2014
Antimüllerian hormone and antral follicle count are lower in female cancer survivors and healthy women taking hormonal contraception.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Human Studies-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of medication on serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in women of reproductive age: a meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Fertility restoration in mice with chemotherapy induced ovarian failure using differentiated iPSCs.EBioMedicine · 2023Article
- Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.Cancers · 2022Review
- Outdoor air pollution and anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in the Sister Study.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
- Duration, recency, and type of hormonal contraceptive use and antimüllerian hormone levels.Fertility and sterility · 2021Article
- Decline of ovarian function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in a longitudinal cohort.RMD open · 2020Article
- Chemotherapy-related damage to ovarian reserve in childhood cancer survivors: interpreting the evidence.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers.Fertility and sterility · 2017Article
- Female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve even before initiation of chemotherapy when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016Article
- Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the impact of hormonal contraception (HC) on markers of ovarian reserve, including antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC).
designLongitudinal prospective cohort.
settingUniversity hospital. PATIENT(S): Young adult female cancer survivors and healthy similar-age women. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants were followed annually to determine hormone levels and for transvaginal ultrasound. Subjects who used HC within the preceding 3 months were considered to be exposed. Linear mixed effects models were used to incorporate repeated measures and adjust for potential confounders. RESULT(S): A total of 249 women (126 survivors, 123 control subjects; average age 25.5 years) were followed for an average of 2.1 visits and 2.15 years. After adjusting for confounders, AMH was found to be 21% lower among survivors using HC and 55% lower among control subjects using HC (relative risk [RR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.93; and RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.68; respectively). AFC was 20% lower among survivors and control subjects using HC (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93). When considering an individual subject, AMH was 17%-35% lower when a subject had recently used HC than when she had not (survivors: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.93; control subjects: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78), and AFC was 11% lower (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96). Additive HC exposure across multiple visits was not associated with differences in AMH or AFC. CONCLUSION(S): AMH and AFC are significantly lower among women with recent exposure to HC. AMH and AFC should be interpreted with caution when measured in the setting of recent hormone use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.