ArticleFertility and sterility2014
A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a nomogram for subsequent first-cycle live births in patients diagnosed with recurrent implantation failure: a population-based analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Trial
- Nomogram for the cumulative live birth in women undergoing the first IVF cycle: Base on 26, 689 patients in China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Trial
- Machine learning prediction of live birth after IVF using the morphological uterus sonographic assessment group features of adenomyosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The development of nomograms to predict multiple pregnancy and multiple birth in frozen- thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of IVF Outcomes: The Central Role of Female Preprocedural Factors.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Machine learning algorithms in constructing prediction models for assisted reproductive technology (ART) related live birth outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Race and ethnicity expression in reproductive endocrinology and infertility research studies compared with other obstetrics and gynecology subspecialty studies.F&S reports · 2024Article
- Patient-Centric In Vitro Fertilization Prognostic Counseling Using Machine Learning for the Pragmatist.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2024Review
- Pretreatment prediction for IVF outcomes: generalized applicable model or centre-specific model?Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Does cleavage stage morphology increase the discriminatory power of prediction in blastocyst transfer outcome?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- External validation of models for predicting cumulative live birth over multiple complete cycles of IVF treatment.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Predicting cumulative live birth for couples beginning their second complete cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Accounting for past patient composition in evaluations of quality reporting.Health services research · 2022Article
- Internal validation and comparison of predictive models to determine success rate of infertility treatments: a retrospective study of 2485 cycles.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The (decision) tree of fertility: an innovative decision-making algorithm in assisted reproduction technique.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donationHuman reproduction open · 2022Article
- Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021Article
- Individualized embryo selection strategy developed by stacking machine learning model for better in vitro fertilization outcomes: an application study.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021Article
- Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011.
designLongitudinal cohort.
settingClinic-based data. PATIENT(S): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULT(S): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.