Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24934487›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2014

A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.

Barbara Luke, Morton B Brown, Ethan Wantman, Judy E Stern, Valerie L Baker, Eric Widra, Charles C Coddington, William E Gibbons, G David Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara LukeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Electronic address: lukeb@msu.edu.
Morton B BrownDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ethan WantmanRedshift Technologies, New York, New York.
Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Valerie L BakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Eric WidraShady Grove Fertility Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Charles C CoddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
William E GibbonsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
G David BallSeattle Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Assisted Reproductive Technology & Risk of Childhood CancerR01CA151973 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LUKE, BARBARA JOAN, SPECTOR, LOGAN G. · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011.

designLongitudinal cohort.

settingClinic-based data. PATIENT(S): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULT(S): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes.

Indexed as

Live BirthModels, StatisticalMultiple Birth OffspringPregnancy, MultipleReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfertility, FemaleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPrognosisAssisted reproductive technologyBMIdonor cycleprediction model

Identifiers

PMID24934487
PMCPMC4188433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.