Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24934409›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Variable access to quality nutrition information regarding inflammatory bowel disease: a survey of patients and health professionals and objective examination of written information.

Alexis C Prince, Arifa Moosa, Miranda C E Lomer, Dianne P Reidlinger, Kevin Whelan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Health Professionals' Knowledge of Probiotics: An International Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. A comparison of patients' and dietitians' perceptions of patient-centred care: A cross-sectional survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis C PrinceDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Arifa MoosaDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Miranda C E LomerDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Dianne P ReidlingerDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Kevin WhelanDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) report a range of nutritional and dietary problems and high-quality written information should be available on these. There is little research investigating the availability and quality of such information for patients with IBD.

objectiveThis study assessed the type and quality of written information on nutrition and diet available to patients with IBD and the opinions of patients and health professionals. SETTING AND

participantsSeventy-two patients with IBD were recruited from a large gastroenterology outpatient centre in England. One hundred dietitians from across the United Kingdom were also recruited.

methodsFace-to-face surveys were conducted with patients with IBD. Questions regarding the use, format and usefulness of dietary information received were probed. Dietitians were surveyed regarding written dietary information used in clinical practice. Samples of IBD-specific dietary information used across the UK were objectively assessed using two validated tools. MAIN

resultsThe majority of patients rated written information as 'good' or 'very good', with the most useful information relating to 'general diet and IBD'. Forty-nine (49%) dietitians reported gaps in written information available for patients with IBD. Fifty-three different samples of IBD-specific information sheets were returned, with widely variable objective quality ratings. Commercially produced written information scored greater than locally produced information (BMA tool, P < 0.05).

conclusionsPatient access to high-quality, written, IBD-specific dietary information is variable. IBD-specific written nutrition information needs to be developed in accordance with validated tools to empower patients, encourage self-management and overcome nutritional implications of IBD.

Indexed as

Access to InformationHealth PersonnelNutrition PolicyAdultFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNutritionistsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCrohn's diseasefoodinflammatory bowel diseasenutritionpatient experiencepatient informationulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID24934409
PMCPMC5810632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.