Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24934158›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2014

Cardiopulmonary toxicity of peat wildfire particulate matter and the predictive utility of precision cut lung slices.

Yong Ho Kim, Haiyan Tong, Mary Daniels, Elizabeth Boykin, Q Todd Krantz, John McGee, Michael Hays, Kasey Kovalcik, Janice A Dye, M Ian Gilmour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
135.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term exposure to wildfire-related PMThe Lancet. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. In the wake of wildfires, toxic smoke is a lasting health concern.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Landscape fire PMNature communications · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong Ho Kim
Haiyan Tong
Mary Daniels
Elizabeth Boykin
Q Todd Krantz
John McGee
Michael Hays
Kasey Kovalcik
Janice A Dye
M Ian GilmourEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U,S, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. gilmour.ian@epa.gov.
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmissions from a large peat fire in North Carolina in 2008 were associated with increased hospital admissions for asthma and the rate of heart failure in the exposed population. Peat fires often produce larger amounts of smoke and last longer than forest fires, however few studies have reported on their toxicity. Moreover, reliable alternatives to traditional animal toxicity testing are needed to reduce the number of animals required for hazard identification and risk assessments.

methodsSize-fractionated particulate matter (PM; ultrafine, fine, and coarse) were obtained from the peat fire while smoldering (ENCF-1) or when nearly extinguished (ENCF-4). Extracted samples were analyzed for chemical constituents and endotoxin content. Female CD-1 mice were exposed via oropharyngeal aspiration to 100 μg/mouse, and assessed for relative changes in lung and systemic markers of injury and inflammation. At 24 h post-exposure, hearts were removed for ex vivo functional assessments and ischemic challenge. Lastly, 8 mm diameter lung slices from CD-1 mice were exposed (11 μg) ± co-treatment of PM with polymyxin B (PMB), an endotoxin-binding compound.

resultsOn an equi-mass basis, coarse ENCF-1 PM had the highest endotoxin content and elicited the greatest pro-inflammatory responses in the mice including: increases in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid protein, cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and MIP-2), neutrophils and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Exposure to fine or ultrafine particles from either period failed to elicit significant lung or systemic effects. In contrast, mice exposed to ENCF-1 ultrafine PM developed significantly decreased cardiac function and greater post-ischemia-associated myocardial infarction. Finally, similar exposures to mouse lung slices induced comparable patterns of cytokine production; and these responses were significantly attenuated by PMB.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that exposure to coarse PM collected during a peat fire causes greater lung inflammation in association with endotoxin and ROS, whereas the ultrafine PM preferentially affected cardiac responses. In addition, lung tissue slices were shown to be a predictive, alternative assay to assess pro-inflammatory effects of PM of differing size and composition. Importantly, these toxicological findings were consistent with the cardiopulmonary health effects noted in epidemiologic reports from exposed populations.

Indexed as

FiresAir PollutantsAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCytokinesEndotoxinsEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHeart DiseasesInflammationLungLung DiseasesMiceMicrotomyMyocardiumNecrosisAir PollutantsCytokinesEndotoxinsParticulate MatterPolymyxin BReactive Oxygen SpeciesSoil

Identifiers

PMID24934158
PMCPMC4072480
OpenAlexW2135428082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.